# E_0250 — Check order issuance for metering location change
Check order issuance for metering location change
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Check order issuance for metering location change |
| Market role | MSB |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | WiM electricity |
| Section | 8.7.1: AD: Metering location change from LF to MSB |
| Check identifiers | Response: [19005](/en/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/ORDRSP/PI_19005), [19006](/en/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/ORDRSP/PI_19006) |
| EBD version | 4.2 |
| As at | 2026-06-23 |
## Decision tree
\nDecision tree E_0250: Beauftragung zur Messlokationsänderung prüfen\n\n\n\nE_0250\nBeauftragung zur\nMesslokationsänderung prüfen\nChecking role: MSB\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\n\n10\nIst der LF der Marktlokation der\ngenannten Lokation im\ngewünschten\nUmsetzungszeitraum zugeordnet?\n\n\n20\nLiegt dem MSB eine Vollmacht\ndes Letztverbrauchers bzw.\nErzeugers vor?\n\n\nA03\nCluster: Rejection\nVollmacht des Letztverbrauchers\nbzw. Erzeugers liegt nicht vor.\n\n\n30\nIst die Vollmacht plausibel und\ngültig?\n\n\nA04\nCluster: Rejection\nVollmacht ist nicht plausibel und\ngültig.\n\n\n40\nLiegt das gewünschte\nÄnderungsdatum mindestens 20\nWT nach dem\nNachrichteneingangsdatum?\n\n\nA01\nCluster: Rejection\nFrist nicht eingehalten\n\n\nA02\nCluster: Consent\nÄnderung kann durchgeführt werden.\n"} kapitel={"WiM Strom · 8.7.1: AD: Messlokationsänderung vom LF an MSB"} name={"Beauftragung zur Messlokationsänderung prüfen"}>
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Is the LF assigned to the market location of the specified location in the requested implementation period? | no | → Step 20 | — |
| — | — | yes | → Step 40 | — |
| 20 | Does MSB have a power of attorney from the final consumer or producer? | no | A03 | Cluster: Rejection No power of attorney from the final consumer or producer is available. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 30 | — |
| 30 | Is the power of attorney plausible and valid? | no | A04 | Cluster: Rejection Power of attorney is not plausible and valid. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 40 | — |
| 40 | Is the requested change date at least 20 WT after the message receipt date? | no | A01 | Cluster: Rejection Deadline not met |
| — | — | yes | A02 | Cluster: Consent The change can be carried out. |
## Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning | Response check identifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| `A03` | Rejection | No power of attorney from the final consumer or producer is available. | [19006](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/ORDRSP/PI_19006) |
| `A04` | Rejection | Power of attorney is not plausible and valid. | [19006](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/ORDRSP/PI_19006) |
| `A01` | Rejection | Deadline not met | [19006](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/ORDRSP/PI_19006) |
| `A02` | Consent | Change can be carried out. | [19005](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/ORDRSP/PI_19005) |
*Role of the numbers: »response« are the check identifiers that list this tree in the ebd_code column of the check identifier table (knowledge-collection · FV 202604); »checked« is the difference set to it from the return path of the process steps. The »response check identifier« column of the result codes assigns a cluster only because this tree carries exactly one checked message and exactly one response per pole; their pole comes from the use case title of the response.*
:::note{title="Not checked against a process"}
**No** consistency check was carried out for this decision tree — no generated BPMN found. Whether the MACO APP implements this tree completely is therefore not evidenced here.
:::