# E_0281 — Check request
Check request
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Check request |
| Market role | MSB |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | Processes for changing the technical equipment at locations |
| Section | 9.2.1: AD: Metering location change from the LF to the MSB |
| Check identifiers | Response: [21033](/en/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/IFTSTA/PI_21033) |
| EBD version | 4.2 |
| As at | 2026-06-23 |
## Decision tree
\nDecision tree E_0281: Anfrage prüfen\n\n\n\nE_0281\nAnfrage prüfen\nChecking role: MSB\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\n10\nIst der LF der Marktlokation der\ngenannten Lokation im\ngewünschten\nUmsetzungszeitraum zugeordnet?\n\n\n20\nLiegt dem MSB eine Vollmacht\ndes Letztverbrauchers bzw.\nErzeugers vor? Hinweis: Die\nVollmacht kann auch als Link in\nder Anfrage des Angebots zur\nÄnderung der Technik übermittelt\nworden sein.\n\n\nA01\nCluster: Rejection\nVollmacht des Letztverbrauchers\nbzw. Erzeugers liegt nicht vor.\n\n\n30\nIst die Vollmacht plausibel und\ngültig?\n\n\nA02\nCluster: Rejection\nVollmacht ist nicht plausibel und\ngültig.\n\n\n40\nBietet der MSB die Leistungen\ngemäß Preisblatt an?\n\n\nA05\nCluster: Rejection\nDer MSB bietet die Leistung nicht an.\n\n\n50\nIst der LF berechtigt dieses\nProdukt anzufragen?\n\n\nA06\nCluster: Rejection\nDer LF hat keine Berechtigung dieses\nProdukt anzufragen.\n\n\n60\nLiegt die angefragte Technik an\nder Lokation bereits vor?\n\n\nA03\nCluster: Rejection\nBestellte Technik liegt bereits vor.\n\n\n70\nIst die angefragte Technik an der\nbetroffenen Lokation\ngrundsätzlich möglich?\n\n\nA04\nCluster: Rejection\nGewünschte Technik ist an der\nbetroffenen Lokation nicht möglich.\n\n\n80\nIst ein zuvor nicht spezifizierter\nFehler aufgetreten?\n\n\nA99\nCluster: Rejection\nSonstiges\nHinweis: Das identifizierte Problem\nist in der Antwort zu\nbeschreiben/benennen.\nNutzungsmöglichkeit Ende:\n01.10.2026 00:00 Uhr\n\nAngebot versenden\n"} kapitel={"Prozesse zur Änderung der Technik an Lokationen · 9.2.1: AD: Messlokationsänderung vom LF an MSB"} name={"Anfrage prüfen"}>
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Is the LF assigned to the market location of the specified location in the requested implementation period? | yes | → Step 40 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 20 | — |
| 20 | Does MSB have a power of attorney from the final consumer or producer? Note: The power of attorney may also have been transmitted as a link in the request for the quotation for the change of technology. | yes | → Step 30 | — |
| — | — | no | A01 | Cluster: Rejection No power of attorney from the final consumer or producer is available. |
| 30 | Is the power of attorney plausible and valid? | yes | → Step 40 | — |
| — | — | no | A02 | Cluster: Rejection Power of attorney is not plausible and valid. |
| 40 | Does the MSB offer the services in accordance with the price sheet? | yes | → Step 50 | — |
| — | — | no | A05 | Cluster: Rejection The MSB does not offer the service. |
| 50 | Is the LF entitled to request this product? | yes | → Step 60 | — |
| — | — | no | A06 | Cluster: Rejection The LF is not authorized to request this product. |
| 60 | Does the requested technology already exist at the location? | yes | A03 | Cluster: Rejection Ordered technology is already in place. |
| — | — | no | → Step 70 | — |
| 70 | Is the requested technology fundamentally possible at the affected location? | yes | → Step 80 | — |
| — | — | no | A04 | Cluster: Rejection The requested technology is not possible at the location concerned. |
| 80 | Has a previously unspecified error occurred? | yes | A99 | Cluster: Rejection Other Note: The identified problem must be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.10.2026 00:00 |
| — | — | no | End | Send quotation |
## Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| `A01` | Rejection | No power of attorney from the final consumer or producer is available. |
| `A02` | Rejection | Power of attorney is not plausible and valid. |
| `A05` | Rejection | The MSB does not offer the service. |
| `A06` | Rejection | The LF is not authorised to request this product. |
| `A03` | Rejection | The ordered technology is already in place. |
| `A04` | Rejection | The requested technology is not possible at the affected location. |
| `A99` | Rejection | Other Note: The identified problem is to be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.10.2026 00:00 |
*Role of the numbers: »response« are the check identifiers that list this tree in the ebd_code column of the check identifier table (knowledge-collection · FV 202604); »checked« is the difference set to it from the return path of the process steps.*
:::note{title="Not checked against a process"}
**No** consistency check was carried out for this decision tree — no generated BPMN found. Whether the MACO APP implements this tree completely is therefore not evidenced here.
:::