# E_0505 — Check invoice for a miscellaneous service again
check invoice for another service again
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Check invoice for a miscellaneous service again |
| Market role | LF |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | GPKE |
| Section | 6.11.3: AD: Billing of a miscellaneous service |
| Check identifiers | Response: [33002](/en/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/REMADV/PI_33002) |
| EBD version | 4.2 |
| As at | 2026-06-23 |
## Decision tree
\nDecision tree E_0505: erneut Rechnung einer sonstigen Leistung prüfen\n\n\n\nE_0505\nerneut Rechnung einer\nsonstigen Leistung prüfen\nChecking role: LF\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\n1\nKonnte der Rechnungssteller den\nEinwand des\nRechnungsempfängers\nentkräften?\n\n\nA01\nRechnungsempfänger ist nach\nerneuter Prüfung immer noch der\nAnsicht, dass das Nichtzahlungsavis\ngerechtfertigt ist.\nHinweis: Der Einwand ist in der\nAntwort zu beschreiben.\n\n\n2\nLiegen weitere Fehler in der\nRechnung vor?\n\n\nA02\nRechnung wird aufgrund noch nicht\ngemeldeter Fehler weiterhin\nabgelehnt.\nHinweis: Die Fehler sind in der\nAntwort zu beschreiben.\n\nRechnung zustimmen und im\nZahlungsavis berücksichtigen\n"} kapitel={"GPKE · 6.11.3: AD: Abrechnung einer sonstigen Leistung"} name={"erneut Rechnung einer sonstigen Leistung prüfen"}>
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Was the invoice issuer able to refute the objection of the invoice recipient? | no | A01 | After re-examination, the invoice recipient still considers the non-payment advice to be justified. Note: The objection must be described in the response. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 2 | — |
| 2 | Are there further errors in the invoice? | yes | A02 | Invoice is still rejected because of errors not yet reported. Note: The errors must be described in the response. |
| — | — | no | End | Approve invoice and take it into account in the payment advice |
## Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| `A01` | — | After re-examination, the invoice recipient still considers the non-payment advice to be justified. Note: The objection must be described in the response. |
| `A02` | — | Invoice is still rejected because of errors not yet reported. Note: The errors must be described in the response. |
*Role of the numbers: »response« are the check identifiers that list this tree in the ebd_code column of the check identifier table (knowledge-collection · FV 202604); »checked« is the difference set to it from the return path of the process steps.*
:::note{title="Not checked against a process"}
**No** consistency check was carried out for this decision tree — no generated BPMN found. Whether the MACO APP implements this tree completely is therefore not evidenced here.
:::