# E_0624 — Check request for termination of the assignment
Check request for termination of the assignment
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Check request for termination of the assignment |
| Market role | LF |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | GPKE |
| Section | 6.6.3: AD: Start of supply |
| Check identifiers | checked: [55010](/en/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55010) · response: [55011](/en/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55011), [55012](/en/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55012) |
| EBD version | 4.2 |
| As at | 2026-06-23 |
## Decision tree
\nDecision tree E_0624: Anfrage zur Beendigung der Zuordnung prüfen\n\n\n\nE_0624\nAnfrage zur Beendigung der\nZuordnung prüfen\nChecking role: LF\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\n5\nIst die Anfrage ausgehend vom ÜT\nder Lieferanmeldung bis 07:00\nUhr des nächsten Werktages\neingegangen?\n\n\nA43\nCluster: Rejection\nFristüberschreitung\n\n\n10\nWurde der Anwendungsfall für\neine verbrauchende Marktlokation\nverwendet?\n\n\n20\nBesteht zum Folgetag des in der\nAnfrage zur Beendigung der\nZuordnung genannten Termins\neine Zuordnung für diese\nMarktlokation? Hinweis: Ist der\nKunde in der E/G, ist diese Frage\nebenfalls mit ja zu beantworten\n\n\n30\nLiegt dem LFA bereits eine\nbestätigtes Zuordnungsende vor?\n\n\nA30\nCluster: Rejection\nDie Belieferung wurde zu dem\nangefragten Ter-min aus der Anfrage\nzur Beendigung der Zuordnung\nbereits beendet und eine Abmeldung\nvon dem LFA bereits versendet, die\ndurch den NB bereits bestätigt\nwurde.\n\n\nA31\nCluster: Consent\nZustimmung der Anfrage zur\nBeendigung der Zuordnung zum in\nder bereits versendeten Abmeldung\n(welche noch nicht beantwortet\nwurde) genannten Termin.\n\n\n40\nLiegt in der Anfrage zur\nBeendigung der Zuordnung der\nTransaktionsgrund Ein-/ Auszug\n(Umzug) vor?\n\n\n50\nIst der Kunde aus der Anfrage zur\nBeendigung der Zuordnung\nidentisch mit dem Kunden beim\nLFA?\n\n\nA32\nCluster: Rejection\nEs handelt sich nicht um einen\nEinzug, da der Kunde aus der Anfrage\nzur Beendigung der Zuordnung\nidentisch mit dem Kunden beim LFA\nist.\n\n\n60\nHat der LFA Informationen\ndarüber, dass sein Kunde nicht\nausgezogen ist?\n\n\nA33\nCluster: Rejection\nDer LFA hat die Information, dass der\nKunde nicht ausgezogen ist.\n\n\nA34\nCluster: Consent\nDer LFA beendet die Belieferung und\nteilt sein Lieferendedatum in der\nAntwort mit.\n\n\n70\nIst der LFA ein Lieferant der auch\nGrundversorger ist?\n\n\n80\nBefindet sich die Marktlokation\nzum Folgetag des Enddatums aus\nder Anfrage zur Beendigung der\nZuordnung in der\nErsatz-versorgung?\n\n\nA38\nCluster: Consent\nErsatzversorgung wurde zum\nangefragten Termin beendet.\n\n\n90\nBleibt das Vertragsverhältnis des\nLFA mit dem Kunden an dieser\nMarktlokation / Tranchen zum Tag\nnach dem Enddatum aus der\nAnfrage zur Beendigung der\nZuordnung bestehen?\n\n\nA35\nCluster: Rejection\nEs besteht eine Vertragsbindung\n\n\nA36\nCluster: Consent\nVertragsverhältnis wurde zum\nangefragten oder davor liegenden\nTermin beendet.\n\n\n200\nBesteht zum Folgetag des in der\nAnfrage zur Beendigung der\nZuordnung genannten Termins\neine Zuordnung für diese\nMarktlokation / Tranche?\n\n\n210\nLiegt dem LFA bereits eine\nbestätigtes Zuordnungsende vor?\n\n\nA41\nCluster: Rejection\nDie Belieferung wurde zu dem\nangefragten Ter-min aus der Anfrage\nzur Beendigung der Zuordnung\nbereits beendet und eine Abmeldung\nvon dem LFA bereits versendet, die\ndurch den NB bereits bestätigt\nwurde.\n\n\nA42\nCluster: Consent\nZustimmung der Anfrage zur\nBeendigung der Zuordnung zum in\nder bereits versendeten Abmeldung\n(welche noch nicht beantwortet\nwurde) genannten Termin.\n\n\n220\nBleibt das Vertragsverhältnis des\nLFA mit dem Kunden an dieser\nMarktlokation / Tranche zum Tag\nnach dem Enddatum aus der\nAnfrage zur Beendigung der\nZuordnung bestehen?\n\n\nA39\nCluster: Rejection\nEs besteht eine Vertragsbindung\n\n\nA40\nCluster: Consent\nVertragsverhältnis wurde zum\nangefragten oder davor liegenden\nTermin beendet.\n"} kapitel={"GPKE · 6.6.3: AD: Lieferbeginn"} name={"Anfrage zur Beendigung der Zuordnung prüfen"} bpmnFv="202604" bpmnCode="E_0624">
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Was the request received between the ÜT of the supply registration and 07:00 on the next working day? | no | A43 | Cluster: Rejection Deadline exceeded |
| — | — | yes | → Step 10 | — |
| 10 | Was the use case used for a consuming market location? | no | → Step 200 | — |
| — | — | yes | → Step 20 | — |
| 20 | Does an assignment for this market location exist on the day following the date named in the request to end the assignment? Note: If the customer is in the E/G, this question is likewise to be answered with yes | yes | → Step 40 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 30 | — |
| 30 | Does LFA already have a confirmed allocation end? | yes | A30 | Cluster: Rejection Supply has already been ended on the date requested in the request to terminate the assignment, and a deregistration has already been sent by the LFA which has already been confirmed by the NB. |
| — | — | no | A31 | Cluster: Consent Consent to the request for termination of the assignment as of the date named in the deregistration already sent (which has not yet been answered). |
| 40 | Does the request for the termination of the assignment contain the transaction reason move-in/ move-out (relocation)? | no | → Step 70 | — |
| — | — | yes | → Step 50 | — |
| 50 | Is the customer from the request to end the assignment identical to the customer at the LFA? | yes | A32 | Cluster: Rejection This is not a move-in, since the customer from the request to terminate the assignment is identical to the customer at the LFA. |
| — | — | no | → Step 60 | — |
| 60 | Does the LFA have information that its customer has not moved out? | yes | A33 | Cluster: Rejection The LFA has the information that the customer has not moved out. |
| — | — | no | A34 | Cluster: Consent The LFA ends the supply and states its end of supply date in the response. |
| 70 | Is the LFA a supplier that is also a default supplier? | no | → step 90 | — |
| — | — | yes | → Step 80 | — |
| 80 | Is the market location in replacement supply on the day following the end date from the request for termination of the assignment? | no | → step 90 | — |
| — | — | yes | A38 | Cluster: Consent Substitute supply was ended as of the requested date. |
| 90 | Does the contractual relationship of the LFA with the customer at this market location / tranches continue to exist on the day after the end date from the request to terminate the assignment? | yes | A35 | Cluster: Rejection A contractual commitment exists |
| — | — | no | A36 | Cluster: Consent The contractual relationship was ended as of the requested date or an earlier date. |
| 200 | Does an assignment for this market location / tranche exist on the day following the date named in the request to end the assignment? | yes | → Step 220 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 210 | — |
| 210 | Does LFA already have a confirmed allocation end? | yes | A41 | Cluster: Rejection Supply has already been ended on the date requested in the request to terminate the assignment, and a deregistration has already been sent by the LFA which has already been confirmed by the NB. |
| — | — | no | A42 | Cluster: Consent Consent to the request for termination of the assignment as of the date named in the deregistration already sent (which has not yet been answered). |
| 220 | Does the contractual relationship of the LFA with the customer at this market location / tranche continue to exist on the day after the end date from the request to terminate the assignment? | yes | A39 | Cluster: Rejection A contractual commitment exists |
| — | — | no | A40 | Cluster: Consent The contractual relationship was ended as of the requested date or an earlier date. |
## Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning | Response check identifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| `A43` | Rejection | Deadline exceeded | [55012](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55012) |
| `A30` | Rejection | The supply has already been ended on the date requested in the request to end the assignment, and a deregistration has already been sent by the LFA, which has already been confirmed by the NB. | [55012](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55012) |
| `A31` | Consent | Consent to the request to end the assignment as of the date specified in the deregistration already sent (which has not yet been responded to). | [55011](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55011) |
| `A32` | Rejection | This is not a move-in, because the customer from the request to terminate the assignment is identical to the customer at the LFA. | [55012](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55012) |
| `A33` | Rejection | The LFA has the information that the customer has not moved out. | [55012](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55012) |
| `A34` | Consent | The LFA ends the supply and states its end-of-supply date in the response. | [55011](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55011) |
| `A38` | Consent | Substitute supply was terminated on the requested date. | [55011](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55011) |
| `A35` | Rejection | A contractual commitment exists | [55012](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55012) |
| `A36` | Consent | Contractual relationship was terminated as of the requested date or earlier. | [55011](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55011) |
| `A41` | Rejection | The supply has already been ended on the date requested in the request to end the assignment, and a deregistration has already been sent by the LFA, which has already been confirmed by the NB. | [55012](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55012) |
| `A42` | Consent | Consent to the request to end the assignment as of the date specified in the deregistration already sent (which has not yet been responded to). | [55011](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55011) |
| `A39` | Rejection | A contractual commitment exists | [55012](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55012) |
| `A40` | Consent | Contractual relationship was terminated as of the requested date or earlier. | [55011](/schnittstellen/202604/pruefi/UTILMD/PI_55011) |
*Role of the numbers: »response« are the check identifiers that list this tree in the ebd_code column of the check identifier table (knowledge-collection · FV 202604); »checked« is the difference set to it from the return path of the process steps. The »response check identifier« column of the result codes assigns a cluster only because this tree carries exactly one checked message and exactly one response per pole; their pole comes from the use case title of the response.*
:::tip{title="Consistent with the generated process"}
All 13 result codes of the decision tree are contained in the generated process `E_0624.bpmn`.
:::