# E_0503 — Check invoice for a miscellaneous service
Check invoice for another service
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Check invoice for a miscellaneous service |
| Market role | LF |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | GPKE |
| Section | 6.11.1: AD: Billing of a miscellaneous service |
| Check identifiers | Response: [33002](/en/schnittstellen/202610/pruefi/REMADV/PI_33002) |
| EBD version | 4.3 |
| As at | — |
## Decision tree
\nDecision tree E_0503: Rechnung einer sonstigen Leistung prüfen\n\n\n\nE_0503\nRechnung einer sonstigen\nLeistung prüfen\nChecking role: LF\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\n\n1\nHandelt es sich um eine Rechnung\nvon „Verzugskosten“?\n\n\n2\nErfüllt die Rechnung weitere\nAnforderungen gem. §14 Abs. 4\nUStG?\n\n\nA01\nCluster: Rejection\nRechnung entspricht nicht §14 Abs. 4\nUStG.\nHinweis: Die Ablehnung ist zu\nbegründen.\n\n\n3\nIst das Rechnungsdatum ≤ dem\nEingangsdatum?\n\n\nA02\nCluster: Rejection\nRechnungsdatum liegt in der Zukunft\n\n\n4\nLiegt vom Rechnungssteller die in\ndieser Rechnung verwendete\nRechnungsnummer bereits vor?\n\n\nA03\nCluster: Rejection\nRechnungsnummer wurde bereits\nverwendet.\n\n\n5\nLiegt ein Rechenfehler in der\nRechnung vor?\n\n\nA04\nCluster: Rejection\nRechenfehler liegt vor.\n\n\n7\nIst die Frist der Fälligkeit\nunterschritten? Hinweis: Fälligkeit\nunterschritten bedeutet:\nZahlungsziel ≤ 10 WT zum\nRechnungseingangsdatum\n\n\nA05\nCluster: Rejection\nDas Zahlungsziel ist unterschritten.\n\n\n9\nHandelt es sich um eine Rechnung\nvon „Verzugskosten“?\n\n\n10\nWerden die Positionen mit dem\nkorrekten Steuersatz\nabgerechnet?\n\n\nA07\nCluster: Rejection\nMindestens eine der Positionen ist\nmit dem falschen Steuersatz\nabgerechnet.\n\n\n11\nHandelt es sich um eine Rechnung\nvon\n„Unterbrechung/Wiederherstellun\ng der Anschlussnutzung“?\n\n\n12\nLiegt für den\nAbrechnungszeitpunkt ein\ngültiges Preisblatt „Preisblatt\nSperren / Entsperren und\nVerzugskosten“ vor?\n\n\nA08\nCluster: Rejection\nDem Lieferanten liegt kein gültiges\nPreisblatt „Preisblatt Sperren /\nEntsperren und Verzugskosten“ vor.\n\n\n13\nHat der Lieferant einen\nSperrauftrag mit der in der\nRechnung vorhandenen\nAuftragsnummer des\nSperrauftrags bestellt?\n\n\nA09\nCluster: Rejection\nDer abzurechnende Sperrauftrag ist\nnicht bekannt.\n\n\n14\nWurde der Sperrauftrag bereits\nabgerechnet?\n\n\n15\nWurde diese Rechnung zum\nSperrauftrag wieder storniert?\n\n\nA10\nCluster: Rejection\nDer Sperrauftrag wurde bereits\nabgerechnet (doppelte Rechnung).\n\n\n16\nIst der identifizierte Sperrauftrag\nstorniert und die Stornierung\nbestätigt worden?\n\n\n17\nWird in der Rechnung die\nArtikel-ID [2-01-7-004]\n(Stornierung eines Auftrags zur\nUnterbrechung der\nAnschlussnutzung bis zum Vortag\nder Sperrung) oder Artikel-ID\n[2-01-7-005] (Stornierung eines\nAuftrags zur Unterbrechung der\nAnschlussnutzung am Tag der\nSperrung) abgerechnet?\n\n\nA11\nCluster: Rejection\nDer abgerechnete Artikel entspricht\nnicht der abzurechnenden Leistung\nfür einen stornierten Auftrag zur\nUnterbrechung der\nAnschlussnutzung.\n\n\n18\nEntspricht der Preis in der\nRechnung dem Preis aus dem\nPreisblatt?\n\n\nA12\nCluster: Rejection\nPreis in der Rechnung passt nicht\nzum Preis „Stornierung eines\nAuftrags zur Unterbrechung der\nAnschlussnutzung“ des Preisblatts\nbzw. Artikel-ID ist im Preisblatt nicht\ngenannt.\n\n\n19\nWar die Sperrung aus dem\nSperrauftrag erfolgreich?\n\n\n20\nWurde von dem Lieferanten\nbereits die Wiederherstellung der\nAnschlussnutzung für die aus\ndiesem Auftrag umgesetzte\nUnterbrechung der\nAnschlussnutzung beauftragt?\n\n\n21\nWurde die Entsperrung vom\nLieferanten mit der Option\n„Entsperrung auch außerhalb der\nregulären Arbeitszeit“\nbeauftragt?\n\n\n22\nWerden in der Rechnung die\nbeiden Artikel-IDs [2-01-7-001]\n(Unterbrechung der\nAnschlussnutzung in der\nregulären Arbeitszeit) und\n[2-01-7-002] (Wiederherstellung\nder Anschlussnutzung in der\nregulären Arbeitszeit)\nabgerechnet?\n\n\nA13\nCluster: Rejection\nDie abgerechnete(en) Artikel-ID\nentspricht nicht der abzurechnenden\nLeistung für eine Unterbrechung und\nWiederherstellung der\nAnschlussnutzung.\n\n\n23\nWird in der Rechnung die\nArtikel-ID [2-01-7-001]\n(Unterbrechung der\nAnschlussnutzung in der\nregulären Arbeitszeit) und\nzusätzlich genau eine der beiden\nArtikel-ID [2-01-7-002]\n(Wiederherstellung der\nAnschlussnutzung in der\nregulären Arbeitszeit) oder\n[2-01-7-006] (Wiederherstellung\nder Anschlussnutzung außerhalb\nder regulären Arbeitszeit)\nabgerechnet?\n\n\nA14\nCluster: Rejection\nDie abgerechnete(en) Artikel-ID\nentspricht nicht der abzurechnenden\nLeistung für eine Unterbrechung und\nWiederherstellung der\nAnschlussnutzung.\n\n\n24\nEntsprechen die Preise in der\nRechnung den Preisen aus dem\nPreisblatt?\n\n\nA15\nCluster: Rejection\nMindestens ein Preis in der Rechnung\npasst nicht zum Preis für eine\nUnterbrechung und\nWiederherstellung der\nAnschlussnutzung auf dem Preisblatt\nbzw. mindestens eine Artikel-ID ist\nim Preisblatt nicht genannt\n\n\n25\nWird in der Rechnung die\nArtikel-ID [2-01-7-003]\n(Erfolglose Unterbrechung)\nabgerechnet?\n\n\nA16\nCluster: Rejection\nDer abgerechnete Artikel entspricht\nnicht der abzurechnenden Leistung\nfür eine erfolglose Unterbrechung\n\n\n26\nEntspricht der Preis in der\nRechnung dem Preis aus dem\nPreisblatt?\n\n\nA17\nCluster: Rejection\nPreis in der Rechnung passt nicht\nzum Preis für eine erfolglose\nUnterbrechung auf dem Preisblatt\nbzw. Artikel-ID ist im Preisblatt nicht\ngenannt\n\n\n27\nLiegt für den\nAbrechnungszeitpunkt ein\ngültiges Preisblatt „Preisblatt\nSperren / Entsperren und\nVerzugskosten“ vor?\n\n\nA18\nCluster: Rejection\nDem Lieferanten liegt kein gültiges\nPreisblatt für die Verzugskosten vor\n\n\n28\nLiegt dem Lieferanten die\nRechnung vor, auf die sich die\nVerzugskostenrechnung bezieht?\n\n\nA19\nCluster: Rejection\nDie Rechnung, auf die sich die\nVerzugskostenrechnung bezieht, ist\nnicht bekannt.\n\n\n29\nWird in der Rechnung die\nArtikel-ID [2-02-0-001]\n(Verzugskosten pauschal) oder\nArtikel-ID [2-02-0-002]\n(Verzugskosten variabel)\nabgerechnet?\n\n\nA20\nCluster: Rejection\nDer abgerechnete Artikel entspricht\nnicht der abzurechnenden Leistung\nfür Verzugskosten\n\n\n30\nSind die Verzugskosten\ngerechtfertigt?\n\n\nA21\nCluster: Rejection\nDie Verzugskosten sind nicht\ngerechtfertigt\n\n\n31\nWerden die Verzugskosten\npauschal mit der Artikel-ID\n[2-02-0-001] (Verzugskosten\npauschal) abgerechnet?\n\n\n32\nEntspricht der Preis in der\nRechnung dem Preis aus dem\nPreisblatt?\n\n\nA22\nCluster: Rejection\nPreis in der Rechnung passt nicht\nzum Preis für Verzugskosten auf dem\nPreisblatt bzw. Artikel-ID ist im\nPreisblatt nicht genannt\n\n\n33\nEntsprechen die geltend\ngemachten Verzugskosten den\ngesetzlichen Regelungen?\n\n\nA23\nCluster: Rejection\nPreis ist in der Höhe nicht\nangemessen\n\n\n34\nIst die Abrechnung der Blindarbeit\nzwischen Lieferanten und\nNetzbetreiber für diese Lokation\nfür den abgerechneten Zeitraum\nvereinbart?\n\n\nA24\nCluster: Rejection\nDie Abrechnung der Blindarbeit ist\nnicht mit dem Lieferanten vereinbart\n\n\n35\nLiegt für den\nAbrechnungszeitpunkt ein\ngültiges Preisblatt „Preisblatt\nBlindarbeit“ vor?\n\n\nA25\nCluster: Rejection\nDem Lieferanten liegt kein gültiges\nPreisblatt für die freiwillige\nAbrechnung sonstiger Leistungen vor\n\n\n36\nIst der Empfänger der Rechnung\nfür den genannten\nAbrechnungszeitraum der\ngenannten Lokation mindestens\neinen Tag zugeordnet?\n\n\nA26\nCluster: Rejection\nDer LF lehnt die Zahlung der\nBlindarbeitsrechnung ab. Der LF ist\nder Lokation nicht einen Tag des\nAbrechnungszeitraumes zugeordnet.\n\n\n37\nIst der Empfänger der Rechnung\nfür den gesamten genannten\nAbrechnungszeitraum der\ngenannten Lokation zugeordnet?\n\n\nA32\nCluster: Rejection\nDer LF lehnt die Zahlung der\nBlindarbeitsrechnung ab. Eine\nAblehnung der Zahlung wird durch\nden LF begründet.\nHinweis: Der LF gibt den erwarteten\nAbrechnungszeitraum an.\n\n\n38\nIst das Rechnungsdatum < das\nEnde des\nAbrechnungszeitraumes?\n\n\nA33\nCluster: Rejection\nDas Rechnungsdatum liegt vor dem\nEnde des Abrechnungszeitraumes.\n\n\n39\nIst in dem Rechnungszeitraum ein\nbereits abgerechnetes\nZeitintervall enthalten?\n\n\nA27\nCluster: Rejection\nDie Rechnung enthält einen bereits\nabgerechneten Zeitraum\n\n\n40\nLiegen dem Lieferanten die\nrelevanten Messwerte vom MSB\nvor?\n\n\nA28\nCluster: Rejection\nDie relevanten Messwerte zur\nRechnungsprüfung liegen nicht vor\n\n\n41\nWurde die vertraglich vereinbarte\nMenge Blindarbeit abgerechnet?\n\n\nA29\nCluster: Rejection\nMenge der Blindarbeit ist nicht\nkorrekt\n\n\n42\nWird in der Rechnung eine der\nfolgenden Artikel-IDs\nabgerechnet? [3-01-0-001]\n(Blindarbeit) [3-02-0-001]\n(Blindarbeit 1) [3-02-0-002]\n(Blindarbeit 2)\n\n\nA30\nCluster: Rejection\nDer abgerechnete Artikel entspricht\nkeiner Artikel-ID für Blindarbeit\n\n\n43\nEntspricht der Preis in der\nRechnung dem Preis aus dem\nPreisblatt?\n\n\nA31\nCluster: Rejection\nPreis in der Rechnung passt nicht\nzum Preis für Blindarbeit auf dem\nPreisblatt bzw. Artikel-ID ist im\nPreisblatt nicht genannt\n\n\n44\nIst ein zuvor nicht spezifizierter\nFehler aufgetreten?\n\nZahlungsavis versenden\n\n\nA99\nCluster: Rejection Other\nHinweis: Das identifizierte Problem\nist in der Antwort zu\nbeschreiben/benennen.\nNutzungsmöglichkeit Ende:\n01.04.2027 00:00 Uhr\n"} kapitel={"GPKE · 6.11.1: AD: Abrechnung einer sonstigen Leistung"} name={"Rechnung einer sonstigen Leistung prüfen"}>
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Is this an invoice for „late payment charges“? | yes | → Step 3 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 2 | — |
| 2 | Does the invoice meet further requirements pursuant to §14 Abs. 4 UStG? | no | A01 | Cluster: Rejection Invoice does not comply with §14 Abs. 4 UStG. Note: The rejection must be substantiated. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 3 | — |
| 3 | Is the invoice date ≤ the receipt date? | no | A02 | Cluster: Rejection Invoice date is in the future |
| — | — | yes | → Step 4 | — |
| 4 | Does the invoice number used in this invoice already exist from the invoice issuer? | yes | A03 | Cluster: Rejection Invoice number has already been used. |
| — | — | no | → Step 5 | — |
| 5 | Is there a calculation error in the invoice? | yes | A04 | Cluster: Rejection There is a calculation error. |
| — | — | no | → Step 7 | — |
| 7 | Is the due date deadline undercut? Note: undercut due date means: payment term ≤ 10 WT from the invoice receipt date | yes | A05 | Cluster: Rejection The payment term falls below the minimum. |
| — | — | no | → step 9 | — |
| 9 | Is this an invoice for „late payment charges“? | yes | → Step 27 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 10 | Note: This is an invoice for reactive energy or interruption / restoration of grid connection use. |
| 10 | Are the line items billed with the correct tax rate? | no | A07 | Cluster: Rejection At least one of the items has been billed with the incorrect tax rate. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 11 | — |
| 11 | Is this an invoice for „interruption/restoration of the grid connection use“? | yes | → Step 12 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 34 | Note: This is an invoice for “reactive energy”. |
| 12 | Is a valid price sheet “price sheet disconnect / reconnect and late payment charges” available for the billing point in time? | no | A08 | Cluster: Rejection The supplier has no valid price sheet „Price sheet disconnect / reconnect and late payment charges“. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 13 | — |
| 13 | Did the supplier order a disconnection order with the order number of the disconnection order stated in the invoice? | no | A09 | Cluster: Rejection The disconnection order to be billed is not known. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 14 | — |
| 14 | Has the disconnection order already been billed? | yes | → Step 15 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 16 | — |
| 15 | Has this invoice for the disconnection order been cancelled again? | no | A10 | Cluster: Rejection The disconnection order has already been billed (duplicate invoice). |
| — | — | yes | → Step 16 | — |
| 16 | Has the identified disconnection order been cancelled and the cancellation confirmed? | yes | → Step 17 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 19 | Note: The disconnection order was not canceled or the cancellation was made too late and was therefore rejected. |
| 17 | Is article ID [2-01-7-004] (cancellation of an order to interrupt grid connection use up to the day before the disconnection) or article ID [2-01-7-005] (cancellation of an order to interrupt grid connection use on the day of the disconnection) billed in the invoice? | no | A11 | Cluster: Rejection The billed article does not correspond to the service to be billed for a cancelled order for the interruption of the grid connection use. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 18 | — |
| 18 | Does the price in the invoice match the price from the price sheet? | no | A12 | Cluster: Rejection Price in the invoice does not match the price “Cancellation of an order to interrupt grid connection use” on the price sheet, or the article ID is not named in the price sheet. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 44 | — |
| 19 | Was the disconnection from the disconnection order successful? | yes | → Step 20 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 25 | Note: Disconnection was not successful. |
| 20 | Has the supplier already ordered the restoration of the grid connection use for the interruption of the grid connection use implemented from this order? | yes | → Step 21 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 22 | — |
| 21 | Was the reconnection ordered by the supplier with the option “reconnection also outside regular working hours”? | yes | → Step 23 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 22 | — |
| 22 | Are both article IDs [2-01-7-001] (interruption of grid connection use during regular working hours) and [2-01-7-002] (restoration of grid connection use during regular working hours) billed in the invoice? | no | A13 | Cluster: Rejection The billed article ID(s) do(es) not correspond to the service to be billed for an interruption and restoration of the grid connection use. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 24 | — |
| 23 | Is article ID [2-01-7-001] (interruption of grid connection use during regular working hours) and, in addition, exactly one of the two article IDs [2-01-7-002] (restoration of grid connection use during regular working hours) or [2-01-7-006] (restoration of grid connection use outside regular working hours) billed in the invoice? | no | A14 | Cluster: Rejection The billed article ID(s) do(es) not correspond to the service to be billed for an interruption and restoration of the grid connection use. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 24 | — |
| 24 | Do the prices in the invoice match the prices from the price sheet? | no | A15 | Cluster: Rejection At least one price in the invoice does not match the price for an interruption and restoration of the grid connection use on the price sheet, or at least one article ID is not named in the price sheet |
| — | — | yes | → Step 44 | — |
| 25 | Is article ID [2-01-7-003] (unsuccessful interruption) billed in the invoice? | no | A16 | Cluster: Rejection The billed article does not correspond to the service to be billed for an unsuccessful interruption |
| — | — | yes | → Step 26 | — |
| 26 | Does the price in the invoice match the price from the price sheet? | no | A17 | Cluster: Rejection Price in the invoice does not match the price for an unsuccessful interruption on the price sheet, or the article ID is not named in the price sheet |
| — | — | yes | → Step 44 | — |
| 27 | Is a valid price sheet “price sheet disconnect / reconnect and late payment charges” available for the billing point in time? | no | A18 | Cluster: Rejection The supplier has no valid price sheet for the late payment charges |
| — | — | yes | → Step 28 | — |
| 28 | Does the supplier have the invoice to which the late payment charges invoice relates? | no | A19 | Cluster: Rejection The invoice to which the late payment charges invoice refers is not known. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 29 | — |
| 29 | Is article ID [2-02-0-001] (flat-rate late payment charges) or article ID [2-02-0-002] (variable late payment charges) billed in the invoice? | no | A20 | Cluster: Rejection The billed article does not correspond to the service to be billed for late payment charges |
| — | — | yes | → Step 30 | — |
| 30 | Are the late payment charges justified? | no | A21 | Cluster: Rejection The late payment charges are not justified |
| — | — | yes | → Step 31 | — |
| 31 | Are the late payment charges billed as a flat rate with article ID [2-02-0-001] (late payment charges, flat rate)? | no | → Step 33 | Note: The late payment charges are billed variably with the article ID [2-02-0-002] |
| — | — | yes | → Step 32 | — |
| 32 | Does the price in the invoice match the price from the price sheet? | no | A22 | Cluster: Rejection Price in the invoice does not match the price for late payment charges on the price sheet, or the article ID is not named in the price sheet |
| — | — | yes | → Step 44 | — |
| 33 | Do the late payment charges asserted comply with the statutory provisions? | no | A23 | Cluster: Rejection Price is not reasonable in amount |
| — | — | yes | → Step 44 | — |
| 34 | Has the billing of reactive energy between supplier and grid operator been agreed for this location for the billed time period? | no | A24 | Cluster: Rejection The billing of reactive energy has not been agreed with the supplier |
| — | — | yes | → Step 35 | — |
| 35 | Is a valid price sheet “price sheet reactive energy” available for the billing point in time? | no | A25 | Cluster: Rejection The supplier has no valid price sheet for the voluntary billing of other services |
| — | — | yes | → Step 36 | — |
| 36 | Is the recipient of the invoice assigned to the stated location for at least one day of the stated billing period? | no | A26 | Cluster: Rejection The LF rejects payment of the reactive energy invoice. The LF is not assigned to the location for a single day of the billing period. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 37 | — |
| 37 | Is the recipient of the invoice assigned to the stated location for the entire stated billing period? | no | A32 | Cluster: Rejection The LF rejects payment of the reactive energy invoice. A rejection of the payment is substantiated by the LF. Note: The LF states the expected billing period. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 38 | — |
| 38 | Is the invoice date < the end of the billing period? | yes | A33 | Cluster: Rejection The invoice date is before the end of the billing period. |
| — | — | no | → Step 39 | — |
| 39 | Does the invoicing period contain a time interval that has already been billed? | yes | A27 | Cluster: Rejection The invoice contains a time period that has already been billed |
| — | — | no | → Step 40 | — |
| 40 | Does the supplier have the relevant meter reading values from MSB? | no | A28 | Cluster: Rejection The meter reading values relevant for the invoice check are not available |
| — | — | yes | → Step 41 | — |
| 41 | Was the contractually agreed quantity of reactive energy billed? | no | A29 | Cluster: Rejection The quantity of reactive energy is not correct |
| — | — | yes | → Step 42 | — |
| 42 | Is one of the following article IDs billed in the invoice? [3-01-0-001] (reactive energy) [3-02-0-001] (reactive energy 1) [3-02-0-002] (reactive energy 2) | no | A30 | Cluster: Rejection The billed article does not correspond to any article ID for reactive energy |
| — | — | yes | → Step 43 | — |
| 43 | Does the price in the invoice match the price from the price sheet? | no | A31 | Cluster: Rejection Price in the invoice does not match the price for reactive energy on the price sheet, or the article ID is not named in the price sheet |
| — | — | yes | → Step 44 | — |
| 44 | Has a previously unspecified error occurred? | no | End | Send remittance advice |
| — | — | yes | A99 | Cluster: Rejection Other Note: The identified problem must be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.04.2027 00:00 |
## Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| `A01` | Rejection | Invoice does not comply with §14 Abs. 4 UStG. Note: The rejection must be justified. |
| `A02` | Rejection | Invoice date is in the future |
| `A03` | Rejection | Invoice number has already been used. |
| `A04` | Rejection | There is a calculation error. |
| `A05` | Rejection | The payment term is undercut. |
| `A07` | Rejection | At least one of the line items is billed at the wrong tax rate. |
| `A08` | Rejection | The supplier does not have a valid price sheet “Price sheet disconnect / reconnect and late payment charges”. |
| `A09` | Rejection | The disconnection order to be billed is not known. |
| `A10` | Rejection | The disconnection order has already been billed (duplicate invoice). |
| `A11` | Rejection | The billed article does not correspond to the service to be billed for a cancelled order to interrupt the grid connection use. |
| `A12` | Rejection | Price in the invoice does not match the price „Cancellation of an order to interrupt grid connection use“ on the price sheet, or the article ID is not named on the price sheet. |
| `A13` | Rejection | The billed article ID(s) do not correspond to the service to be billed for an interruption and restoration of grid connection use. |
| `A14` | Rejection | The billed article ID(s) do not correspond to the service to be billed for an interruption and restoration of grid connection use. |
| `A15` | Rejection | At least one price in the invoice does not match the price for an interruption and restoration of the grid connection use on the price sheet, or at least one article ID is not stated on the price sheet |
| `A16` | Rejection | The billed article does not correspond to the service to be billed for an unsuccessful interruption |
| `A17` | Rejection | Price in the invoice does not match the price for an unsuccessful interruption on the price sheet, or the article ID is not named on the price sheet |
| `A18` | Rejection | The supplier does not have a valid price sheet for the late payment charges |
| `A19` | Rejection | The invoice to which the late payment charges invoice refers is not known. |
| `A20` | Rejection | The billed article does not correspond to the service to be billed for late payment charges |
| `A21` | Rejection | The late payment charges are not justified |
| `A22` | Rejection | Price in the invoice does not match the price for late payment charges on the price sheet, or the article ID is not named on the price sheet |
| `A23` | Rejection | Price is not appropriate in amount |
| `A24` | Rejection | The billing of reactive energy is not agreed with the supplier |
| `A25` | Rejection | The supplier does not have a valid price sheet for the voluntary billing of other services |
| `A26` | Rejection | The LF rejects payment of the reactive energy invoice. The LF is not assigned to the location for a single day of the billing period. |
| `A32` | Rejection | The LF rejects payment of the reactive energy invoice. A rejection of the payment is justified by the LF. Note: The LF states the expected billing period. |
| `A33` | Rejection | The invoice date is before the end of the billing period. |
| `A27` | Rejection | The invoice contains a time period that has already been billed |
| `A28` | Rejection | The meter reading values relevant for invoice verification are not available |
| `A29` | Rejection | The reactive energy quantity is not correct |
| `A30` | Rejection | The billed article does not correspond to any article ID for reactive energy |
| `A31` | Rejection | Price in the invoice does not match the price for reactive energy on the price sheet, or the article ID is not named on the price sheet |
| `A99` | Rejection Other | Note: The identified problem is to be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.04.2027 00:00 |
*Role of the numbers: »response« are the check identifiers that list this tree in the ebd_code column of the check identifier table (knowledge-collection · FV 202610); »checked« is the difference set to it from the return path of the process steps.*
:::note{title="Not checked against a process"}
**No** consistency check was carried out for this decision tree — no generated BPMN found. Whether the MACO APP implements this tree completely is therefore not evidenced here.
:::