# E_0550 — Check complaint
Check complaint
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Check complaint |
| Market role | LF |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | GPKE |
| Section | 6.44.1: AD: Complaint about a definition of the LF from NB to LF |
| Check identifiers | checked: [17122](/en/schnittstellen/202610/pruefi/ORDERS/PI_17122) · response: [19123](/en/schnittstellen/202610/pruefi/ORDRSP/PI_19123) |
| EBD version | 4.3 |
| As at | — |
## Decision tree
\nDecision tree E_0550: Reklamation prüfen\n\n\n\nE_0550\nReklamation prüfen\nChecking role: LF\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\n20\nReklamiert der Absender das\nFehlen der ausgerollten\nSchaltzeitdefinition?\n\n\n30\nEntspricht der Code der\nSchaltzeitdefinition einem Code\naus der für den reklamierten\nZeitraum gültigen Übersicht der\nSchaltzeitdefinitionen?\n\n\nA01\nCode der Schaltzeitdefinition wird\nnicht verwendet\n\n\n40\nWurde die ausgerollte\nSchaltzeitdefinition an den\nAnfragenden versendet?\n\n\nA02\nAusgerollte Schaltzeitdefinition\nwurde versendet\nHinweis: Es ist als Referenz der\nGeschäftsvorfall zu benennen, mit\nwelchem die ausgerollte\nSchaltzeitdefinition übermittelt\nwurde.\n\n\n50\nReklamiert der Anfragende eine\nunplausible ausgerollte\nSchaltzeitdefinition?\n\n\n60\nWurde mit dem Code der\nSchaltzeitdefinition bereits eine\nausgerollte Schaltzeitdefinition\nmit einer höheren Version\nversendet?\n\n\nA03\nEs wurde bereits eine ausgerollte\nSchaltzeitdefinition für den Code der\nSchaltzeitdefinition mit einer höheren\nVersion versendet\nHinweis: Es ist als Referenz der\nGeschäftsvorfall zu benennen, mit\nwelchem die ausgerollte\nSchaltzeitdefinition übermittelt\nwurde.\n\n\n70\nIst die versendete ausgerollte\nSchaltzeitdefinition plausibel?\n\n\nA04\nAusgerollte Schaltzeitdefinition ist\nplausibel\n\n\n100\nReklamiert der Anfragende das\nFehlen der ausgerollten\nLeistungskurvendefinition?\n\n\n120\nEntspricht der Code der\nLeistungskurvendefinition einem\nCode aus der für den reklamierten\nZeitraum gültigen Übersicht der\nLeistungskurvendefinition?\n\n\nA05\nCode der Leistungskurvendefinition\nwird nicht verwendet\n\n\n130\nWurde die ausgerollte\nLeistungskurvendefinition an den\nAnfragenden versendet?\n\n\nA06\nAusgerollte\nLeistungskurvendefinition wurde\nversendet\nHinweis: Es ist als Referenz der\nGeschäftsvorfall zu benennen, mit\nwelchem die ausgerollte\nLeistungskurvendefinition\nübermittelt wurde.\n\n\n140\nReklamiert der Anfragende eine\nunplausible ausgerollte\nLeistungskurvendefinition?\n\n\n150\nWurde mit dem Code der\nLeistungskurvendefinition bereits\neine ausgerollte\nLeistungskurvendefinition mit\neiner höheren Version versendet?\n\n\nA07\nEs wurde bereits eine ausgerollte\nLeistungskurvendefinition für den\nCode der Leistungskurvendefinition\nmit einer höheren Version versendet\nHinweis: Es ist als Referenz der\nGeschäftsvorfall zu benennen, mit\nwelchem die ausgerollte\nLeistungskurvendefinition\nübermittelt wurde.\n\n\n160\nIst die versendete ausgerollte\nLeistungskurvendefinition\nplausibel?\n\n\nA08\nAusgerollte\nLeistungskurvendefinition ist\nplausibel\n\n\n200\nIst ein zuvor nicht spezifizierter\nFehler aufgetreten?\n\n\nA99\nSonstiges\nHinweis: Das identifizierte Problem\nist in der Antwort zu\nbeschreiben/benennen.\nNutzungsmöglichkeit Ende:\n01.04.2027 00:00 Uhr\n\nKorrektur der Definition und die\nerneute Übermittlung durchführen.\n"} kapitel={"GPKE · 6.44.1: AD: Reklamation einer Definition des LF vom NB an LF"} name={"Reklamation prüfen"} bpmnFv="202610" bpmnCode="E_0550">
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | Does the sender complain about the absence of the rolled-out switching time definition? | yes | → Step 30 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 50 | — |
| 30 | Does the code of the switching time definition match a code from the overview of switching time definitions valid for the disputed time period? | no | A01 | Code of the switching time definition is not used |
| — | — | yes | → Step 40 | — |
| 40 | Was the rolled-out switching time definition sent to the requesting party? | yes | A02 | Rolled-out switching time definition has been sent Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out switching time definition was transmitted must be named as a reference. |
| — | — | no | → Step 200 | — |
| 50 | Does the requester complain about an implausible rolled-out switching time definition? | yes | → Step 60 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 100 | — |
| 60 | Has a rolled-out switching time definition with a higher version already been sent with the code of the switching time definition? | yes | A03 | A rolled-out switching time definition with a higher version has already been sent for the switching time definition code Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out switching time definition was transmitted must be named as the reference. |
| — | — | no | → Step 70 | — |
| 70 | Is the transmitted rolled-out switching time definition plausible? | yes | A04 | Rolled-out switching time definition is plausible |
| — | — | no | → Step 200 | — |
| 100 | Does the requester complain about the absence of the rolled-out power curve definition? | yes | → Step 120 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 140 | — |
| 120 | Does the code of the power curve definition match a code from the overview of power curve definitions valid for the disputed time period? | no | A05 | Code of the power curve definition is not used |
| — | — | yes | → Step 130 | — |
| 130 | Was the rolled-out power curve definition sent to the requesting party? | yes | A06 | Rolled-out power curve definition has been sent Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out power curve definition was transmitted must be named as a reference. |
| — | — | no | → Step 200 | — |
| 140 | Does the requester complain about an implausible rolled-out power curve definition? | yes | → Step 150 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 200 | — |
| 150 | Has a rolled-out power curve definition with a higher version already been sent with the code of the power curve definition? | yes | A07 | A rolled-out power curve definition with a higher version has already been sent for the power curve definition code Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out power curve definition was transmitted must be named as the reference. |
| — | — | no | → Step 160 | — |
| 160 | Is the transmitted rolled-out power curve definition plausible? | yes | A08 | Rolled-out power curve definition is plausible |
| — | — | no | → Step 200 | — |
| 200 | Has a previously unspecified error occurred? | yes | A99 | Other Note: The identified problem is to be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.04.2027 00:00 |
| — | — | no | End | Correct the definition and carry out the transmission again. |
## Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| `A01` | — | Code of the switching time definition is not used |
| `A02` | — | Rolled-out switching time definition has been sent Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out switching time definition was transmitted must be named as a reference. |
| `A03` | — | A rolled-out switching time definition with a higher version has already been sent for the switching time definition code Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out switching time definition was transmitted must be named as the reference. |
| `A04` | — | Rolled-out switching time definition is plausible |
| `A05` | — | Code of the power curve definition is not used |
| `A06` | — | Rolled-out power curve definition has been sent Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out power curve definition was transmitted must be named as a reference. |
| `A07` | — | A rolled-out power curve definition with a higher version has already been sent for the power curve definition code Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out power curve definition was transmitted must be named as the reference. |
| `A08` | — | Rolled-out power curve definition is plausible |
| `A99` | — | Other Note: The identified problem is to be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.04.2027 00:00 |
*Role of the numbers: »response« are the check identifiers that list this tree in the ebd_code column of the check identifier table (knowledge-collection · FV 202610); »checked« is the difference set to it from the return path of the process steps.*
:::tip{title="Consistent with the generated process"}
All 9 result codes of the decision tree are contained in the generated process `E_0550.bpmn`.
:::