# E_0594 — Check request from LF
Check request from LF
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Check request from LF |
| Market role | NB |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | GPKE |
| Section | 6.1.1: AD: Determination of the MaLo-ID of the market location |
| EBD version | 4.3 |
| As at | — |
## Decision tree
\nDecision tree E_0594: Anfrage vom LF prüfen\n\n\n\nE_0594\nAnfrage vom LF prüfen\nChecking role: NB\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nyes\n\nno\n\nyes\n\nno\n\n\n10\nIst das Identifikationskriterium\n„Marktlokations-ID“ in der\nAnfrage enthalten?\n\n\n20\nIst das Identifikationskriterium\n„Tranchen-ID“ in der Anfrage\nenthalten?\n\n\n30\nIst die „Marktlokation-ID“ oder\n„Tranchen ID“ dem NB bekannt?\n\n\nA14\nCluster: Rejection\nDie „Marktlokation-ID“ oder\n„Tranchen ID“ ist dem NB nicht\nbekannt.\n\n\n100\nIst das Identifikationskriterium\n„Adresse“ in der Anfrage\nenthalten?\n\n\n105\n[Adressprüfung] (Straße und PLZ\noder geographische Koordinaten\noder Flurstücknummer) Hinweis:\nDas Weglassen der Hausnummer,\nträgt dem Umstand Rechnung,\ndass einige NB eher die Adresse\ndes Geräts und nicht die\nLieferadresse hinterlegt haben.\nWenn der Zähler im Doppelhaus\nnebenan zu finden ist, weiß der\nKunde das ggf. nicht. Das\nWeglassen des Ortes minimiert\ndie Problematik von Tippfehlern,\nOrtsteilen und Ortszusätzen.\n\n\n110\nSind die folgenden\nIdentifikationskriterien in der\nAnfrage vorhanden: Vorname\nund/oder Nachname oder\nFirmenname?\n\n\n115\n[Namensprüfung] (Nachname oder\nFirmenname)\n\n\n120\nIst das Identifikationskriterium\n„Gerätenummer“ in der Anfrage\nenthalten?\n\n\n125\n[Gerätenummernprüfung]\n\n\n130\nIst das Identifikationskriterium\n„MeLo-ID“ in der Anfrage\nenthalten?\n\n\n135\n[MeLo-ID-Prüfung]\n\n\n140\nIst das Identifikationskriterium\n„Kundennummer“ in der Anfrage\nenthalten?\n\n\n150\n[Kundennummer-Prüfung]\n\n\n160\nGibt es in der Trefferliste auf\nBasis eines Kriteriums 1..n Treffer\nmit einem\nIdentifikationskriterium?\n\n\nA01\nCluster: Rejection\nMit einem Identifikationskriterium\nwar keine Marktlokation ermittelbar.\n\n\n205\nSind die Identifikationskriterien\n„Adresse“ und „Vorname\nund/oder Nachname oder\nFirmenname“ in der Anfrage\nenthalten?\n\n\n210\nKombination aus [Adressprüfung]\n(Straße und PLZ oder\ngeographische Koordinaten oder\nFlurstücknummer) und\n[Namensprüfung] (Nachname oder\nFirmenname)\n\n\n215\nSind die Identifikationskriterien\n„Vorname und/oder Nachname\noder Firmenname“ und\n„Gerätenummer“ in der Anfrage\nenthalten?\n\n\n220\nKombination aus\n[Namensprüfung] (Nachname oder\nFirmenname) und\n[Gerätenummernprüfung]\n\n\n225\nSind die Identifikationskriterien\n„Gerätenummer“ und „Adresse“\nin der Anfrage enthalten?\n\n\n230\nKombination aus\n[Gerätenummernprüfung] und\n[Adressprüfung] (PLZ oder\ngeographische Koordinaten oder\nFlurstücknummer)\n\n\n235\nSind die Identifikationskriterien\n„MeLo-ID“ und „Adresse“ in der\nAnfrage enthalten?\n\n\n240\nKombination aus\n[MeLo-ID-Prüfung] und\n[Adressprüfung] (Straße und PLZ\noder geographische Koordinaten\noder Flurstücknummer)\n\n\n245\nSind die Identifikationskriterien\n„MeLo-ID“ und „Vorname\nund/oder Nachname oder\nFirmenname“ in der Anfrage\nenthalten?\n\n\n250\nKombination aus\n[MeLo-ID-Prüfung] und\n[Namensprüfung] (Nachname oder\nFirmenname)\n\n\n261\nSind die Identifikationskriterien\n„Kundennummer“ und „Adresse“\nin der Anfrage enthalten?\n\n\n262\nKombination aus\n[Kundennummer-Prüfung] und\n[Adressprüfung] (Straße und PLZ\noder geographische Koordinaten\noder Flurstücknummer)\n\n\n263\nSind die Identifikationskriterien\n„Kundennummer“ und „Vorname\nund/oder Nachname oder\nFirmenname“ in der Anfrage\nenthalten?\n\n\n264\nKombination aus\n[Kundennummer-Prüfung] und\n[Namensprüfung] (Nachname oder\nFirmenname)\n\n\n265\nGibt es in der Trefferliste auf\nBasis der Kombinationen aus zwei\nKriterien 1..n Treffer mit einer\nKombination der\nIdentifikationskriterien?\n\n\n270\nIst das Identifikationskriterium\n„Adresse“ in der Anfrage\nenthalten?\n\n\n275\nVollständige [Adressprüfung]\n\n\n280\nGibt es in der Trefferliste auf\nBasis der alleinigen\nAdressprüfung genau einen\nTreffer mit dem\nIdentifikationskriterium\n„Adresse“?\n\n\nA02\nCluster: Rejection\nIn der Kombination von zwei\nIdentifikationskriterien war keine\nMarktlokation ermittelbar\nHinweis: Hier erfolgt die Ablehnung,\nwenn\nes keine Marktlokation gibt, bei der\nmindestens eine Kombination aus\nzwei Identifikationskriterien zutrifft\nmit der Adresse allein auch keine\neindeutige Identifikation möglich ist\n\n\n305\nSind die Identifikationskriterien\n„Adresse“, „Vorname und/oder\nNachname oder Firmenname“ und\n„Gerätenummer“ in der Anfrage\nenthalten?\n\n\n310\nKombination aus [Adressprüfung]\n(Straße und PLZ oder\ngeographische Koordinaten oder\nFlurstücknummer),\n[Namensprüfung] (Nachname oder\nFirmenname) und\n[Gerätenummernprüfung]\n\n\n315\nSind die Identifikationskriterien\n„Adresse“, „Vorname und/oder\nNachname oder Firmenname“ und\n„MeLo-ID“ in der Anfrage\nenthalten?\n\n\n320\nKombination aus [Adressprüfung]\n(Straße und PLZ oder\ngeographische Koordinaten oder\nFlurstücknummer),\n[Namensprüfung] (Nachname oder\nFirmenname) und\n[MeLo-ID-Prüfung]\n\n\n343\nSind die Identifikationskriterien\n„Kundennummer“, „Vorname\nund/oder Nachname oder\nFirmenname“ und „Adresse“ in\nder Anfrage enthalten?\n\n\n344\nKombination aus [Adressprüfung]\n(Straße und PLZ oder\ngeographische Koordinaten oder\nFlurstücknummer),\n[Namensprüfung] (Nachname oder\nFirmenname) und\n[Kundennummer-Prüfung]\n\n\n345\nGibt es in der Trefferliste auf\nBasis von drei Kriterien Treffer mit\ndrei Identifikationskriterien?\n\n\n350\nGibt es in der Trefferliste auf\nBasis von zwei Kriterien genau\neinen Treffer mit zwei\nIdentifikationskriterien?\n\n\n355\nIst das Identifikationskriterium\n„Adresse“ in der Anfrage\nenthalten?\n\n\n360\nVollständige [Adressprüfung]\n\n\n365\nGibt es in der Trefferliste auf\nBasis der vollständigen\nAdressprüfung genau einen\nTreffer mit dem\nIdentifikationskriterium\n„Adresse“?\n\n\n370\nIst das Identifikationskriterium\n„Vorname und/oder Nachname\noder Firmenname“ in der Anfrage\nenthalten?\n\n\n375\nVollständige [Namensprüfung]\n\n\n380\nGibt es in der Trefferliste auf\nBasis der vollständigen\nNamensprüfung genau einen\nTreffer mit dem\nIdentifikationskriterium „Vorname\nund/oder Nachname oder\nFirmenname“\n\n\n385\nLiegen 1..n MaLo aus der\nTrefferliste auf Basis von zwei\nKriterien zum Anfragedatum im\nNetzgebiet des NB?\n\n\n390\nNimmt nur eine der ermittelten\nMarktlokation zum Anfragedatum\nan der Marktkommunikation teil?\n\n\nA03\nCluster: Rejection\nMarktlokation nicht eindeutig bzw.\nnimmt nicht an der\nMarktkommunikation teil\n\n\n395\nIst nur eine MaLo in einem\ninnerhalb der vergangenen drei\nJahre abgegebenen Netzgebiet\nermittelbar?\n\n\nA04\nCluster: Rejection\nErmittelte Marktlokation liegt in\neinem in den letzten drei Jahren\nabgegebenen Netzgebiet.\nHinweis: Angabe der MP-ID des NB,\nan den das Netzgebiet abgegeben\nwurde.\n\n\nA05\nCluster: Rejection\nIn der Kombination von zwei\nIdentifikationskriterien war keine\nMarktlokation ermittelbar\n\n\n400\nGibt es in der Trefferliste auf\nBasis von drei Kriterien genau\neinen Treffer, bei dem eine\nKombination aus drei\nIdentifikationskriterien zutrifft?\n\n\n405\nSind alle fünf\nIdentifikationskriterien in der\nAnfrage enthalten?\n\n\n410\nKombination aus [Adressprüfung]\n(Straße und PLZ oder\ngeographische Koordinaten oder\nFlurstücknummer),\n[Namensprüfung] (Nachname oder\nFirmenname),\n[Gerätenummernprüfung] und\n[MeLo-ID-Prüfung],\n[Kundennummer-Prüfung]\n\n\n415\nGibt es in der Trefferliste auf\nBasis von drei Kriterien genau\neinen Treffer mit vier oder mehr\nIdentifikationskriterien?\n\n\n420\nVollständige [Adressprüfung]\n\n\n425\nGibt es in der Trefferliste auf\nBasis der vollständigen\nAdressprüfung genau einen\nTreffer mit dem\nIdentifikationskriterium\n„Adresse“?\n\n\n430\nVollständige [Namensprüfung]\n\n\n435\nGibt es in der Trefferliste auf\nBasis der vollständigen\nNamensprüfung genau einen\nTreffer mit dem\nIdentifikationskriterium „Vorname\nund/oder Nachname oder\nFirmenname“\n\n\n440\nLiegen 1..n MaLo aus der\nTrefferliste auf Basis von drei\nKriterien zum Anfragedatum im\nNetzgebiet des NB?\n\n\n445\nIst nur eine der ermittelten\nMarktlokationen zum\nAnfragedatum nicht stillgelegt?\n\n\nA06\nCluster: Rejection\nMarktlokation nicht eindeutig bzw.\nnimmt nicht an der\nMarktkommunikation teil\n\n\n450\nIst nur eine MaLo in einem\ninnerhalb der vergangenen drei\nJahre abgegebenen Netzgebiet\nermittelbar?\n\n\nA07\nCluster: Rejection\nErmittelte Marktlokation liegt in\neinem in den letzten drei Jahren\nabgegebenen Netzgebiet.\nHinweis: Angabe der MP-ID des NB,\nan den das Netzgebiet abgegeben\nwurde.\n\n\nA08\nCluster: Rejection\nIn der Kombination von drei\nIdentifikationskriterien war keine\nMarktlokation ermittelbar\n\n\n705\nLiegt die ermittelte Marktlokation\nzum Anfragedatum im Netzgebiet\ndes NB?\n\n\nA09\nCluster: Rejection\nErmittelte Marktlokation liegt in\neinem in den letzten drei Jahren\nabgegebenen Netzgebiet.\nHinweis: Angabe der MP-ID des NB,\nan den das Netzgebiet abgegeben\nwurde.\n\n\n710\nHandelt es sich bei der\nidentifizierten Marktlokation um\neine stillgelegte Marktlokation?\n\n\nA10\nCluster: Rejection\nIdentifizierte Marktlokation ist\nstillgelegt\n\n\n720\nWurde für die Identifizierung eine\nVollmacht des Anfragenden vom\nAngefragten angefordert?\n\nCluster: Consent\nÜbergabe der MaLo-ID der\nidentifizierten Marktlokation. Es\nwerden in der Antwort die MaLo-ID\nund der vollständige Datensatz, wie\ndieser beim NB gespeichert ist,\nzurückgegeben.\nHinweis: Bei einer positiven Antwort\nwird kein Antwortcode übermittelt\n\n\n730\nIst die Vollmacht eingetroffen?\n\nHinweis:\nSolange die Vollmacht beim NB nicht\neingetroffen ist, wartet der Prozess\nan diesem Prüfschritt. Diese Prüfung\nist regelmäßig erneut durchzuführen,\nbis die Vollmacht eingetroffen ist.\n\n\n740\nHält der NB die Vollmacht für\nwirksam?\n\nCluster: Consent\nÜbergabe der MaLo-ID der\nidentifizierten Marktlokation. Es\nwerden in der Antwort die MaLo-ID\nund der vollständige Datensatz, wie\ndieser beim NB gespeichert ist,\nzurückgegeben.\nHinweis: Bei einer positiven Antwort\nwird kein Antwortcode übermittelt\n\n\nA13\nCluster: Rejection\nDie vom Anfragenden eingereichte\nVollmacht wird als nicht wirksam\nbetrachtet.\nHinweis: Der NB begründet die\nAblehnung der fehlenden\nWirksamkeit der Vollmacht\n"} kapitel={"GPKE · 6.1.1: AD: Ermittlung der MaLo-ID der Marktlokation"} name={"Anfrage vom LF prüfen"} bpmnFv="202610" bpmnCode="E_0594">
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Is the identification criterion “Market location ID” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 30 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 20 | — |
| 20 | Is the identification criterion “Tranche ID” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 30 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 100 | — |
| 30 | Is the “market location ID” or “tranche ID” known to the NB? | yes | → Step 705 | — |
| — | — | no | A14 | Cluster: Rejection The „market location ID“ or „tranche ID“ is not known to the NB. |
| from 100 | *The following checks are based on the identification criteria from the request and the entire data stock in the system.* | — | — | — |
| 100 | Is the identification criterion “Address” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 105 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 110 | — |
| 105 | [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number) Note: Omitting the house number takes account of the fact that some NB have stored the address of the device rather than the delivery address. If the meter is located in the semi-detached house next door, the customer may not know this. Omitting the town minimizes the problem of typing errors, districts and place-name suffixes. | no | → Step 110 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on one criterion |
| 110 | Are the following identification criteria present in the request: first name and/or surname or company name? | yes | → Step 115 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 120 | — |
| 115 | [Name check] (surname or company name) | no | → Step 120 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on one criterion |
| 120 | Is the identification criterion “Device number” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 125 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 130 | — |
| 125 | [Device number check] | no | → Step 130 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on one criterion |
| 130 | Is the identification criterion “MeLo-ID” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 135 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 140 | — |
| 135 | [MeLo ID check] | no | → Step 140 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on one criterion |
| 140 | Is the identification criterion “Customer number” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 150 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 160 | — |
| 150 | [Customer number check] | no | → Step 160 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on one criterion |
| 160 | Are there 1..n hits in the hit list based on one criterion with one identification criterion? | no | A01 | Cluster: Rejection No market location could be determined from an identification criterion. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 205 | A hit list based on one criterion with 1..n hits from the preceding checks exists |
| from 205 | *The following checks are based on the identification criteria from the request and the hit list based on one criterion from the preceding checks. The hit list contains market locations for which at least one of the identification criteria matches an identification criterion of the request.* | — | — | — |
| 205 | Are the identification criteria “Address” and “First name and/or surname or company name” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 210 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 215 | — |
| 210 | Combination of [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number) and [Name check] (surname or company name) | no | → Step 215 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on two criteria |
| 215 | Are the identification criteria “First name and/or surname or company name” and “Device number” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 220 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 225 | — |
| 220 | Combination of [name check] (last name or company name) and [device number check] | no | → Step 225 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on two criteria |
| 225 | Are the identification criteria “Device number” and “Address” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 230 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 235 | — |
| 230 | Combination of [Device number check] and [Address check] (PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number) | no | → Step 235 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on two criteria |
| 235 | Are the identification criteria “MeLo ID” and “Address” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 240 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 245 | — |
| 240 | Combination of [MeLo ID check] and [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number) | no | → Step 245 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on two criteria |
| 245 | Are the identification criteria “MeLo ID” and “First name and/or surname or company name” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 250 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 261 | — |
| 250 | Combination of [MeLo ID check] and [name check] (last name or company name) | no | → Step 261 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on two criteria |
| 261 | Are the identification criteria “Customer number” and “Address” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 262 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 263 | — |
| 262 | Combination of [Customer number check] and [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number) | no | → Step 263 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on two criteria |
| 263 | Are the identification criteria “Customer number” and “First name and/or surname or company name” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 264 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 265 | — |
| 264 | Combination of [Customer number check] and [Name check] (surname or company name) | no | → Step 265 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on two criteria |
| 265 | Are there 1..n hits in the hit list based on the combinations of two criteria with a combination of the identification criteria? | no | → Step 270 | Offers the option of identifying a MaLo ID solely on the basis of an address |
| — | — | yes | → Step 305 | A hit list based on two criteria with 1..n hits from the preceding checks exists |
| 270 | Is the identification criterion “Address” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 275 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 280 | — |
| 275 | Complete [address check] | no | → Step 280 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on the address check alone |
| 280 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on the address check alone with the identification criterion „address“? | no | A02 | Cluster: Rejection No market location could be determined from the combination of two identification criteria Note: The rejection takes place here if there is no market location for which at least one combination of two identification criteria applies unique identification is also not possible with the address alone |
| — | — | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| from 305 | *The following checks are based on the identification criteria from the request and the hit list based on two criteria from the preceding checks. The hit list contains market locations for which at least one combination of two identification criteria matches the request.* | — | — | — |
| 305 | Are the identification criteria “Address”, “First name and/or surname or company name” and “Device number” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 310 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 315 | — |
| 310 | Combination of [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number), [Name check] (surname or company name) and [Device number check] | no | → Step 315 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on three criteria |
| 315 | Are the identification criteria “Address”, “First name and/or surname or company name” and “MeLo ID” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 320 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 343 | — |
| 320 | Combination of [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number), [Name check] (surname or company name) and [MeLo ID check] | no | → Step 343 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on three criteria |
| 343 | Are the identification criteria “Customer number”, “First name and/or surname or company name” and “Address” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 344 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 345 | — |
| 344 | Combination of [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number), [Name check] (surname or company name) and [Customer number check] | no | → Step 345 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on three criteria |
| 345 | Are there hits in the hit list based on three criteria with three identification criteria? | no | → Step 350 | There is no match with three identification criteria |
| — | — | yes | → Step 400 | There are 1..n matches from the combinations of three identification criteria each |
| 350 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on two criteria with two identification criteria? | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| — | — | no | → Step 355 | There are 2..n matches from the combinations of two identification criteria each |
| 355 | Is the identification criterion “Address” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 360 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 370 | — |
| 360 | Complete [address check] | no | → Step 365 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on the complete address check |
| 365 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on the complete address check with the identification criterion „address“? | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| — | — | no | → Step 385 | — |
| 370 | Is the identification criterion “First name and/or last name or company name” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 375 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 385 | — |
| 375 | Complete [name check] | no | → Step 380 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on the complete name check |
| 380 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on the complete name check with the identification criterion „first name and/or last name or company name“ | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| — | — | no | → Step 385 | — |
| 385 | Are 1..n MaLo from the hit list based on two criteria located in the grid area of NB as at the request date? | yes | → Step 390 | 1..n of the determined MaLo are in the grid area of the NB on the request date |
| — | — | no | → Step 395 | None of the determined MaLo lies within the grid area of the NB on the request date |
| 390 | Does only one of the determined market locations participate in market communication on the request date? | no | A03 | Cluster: Rejection Market location not unique or does not participate in market communication |
| — | — | yes | → Step 720 | — |
| 395 | Can only one MaLo be determined in a grid area handed over within the past three years? | yes | A04 | Cluster: Rejection The determined market location lies in a grid area that was handed over within the last three years. Note: Statement of the MP-ID of the NB to which the grid area was handed over. |
| — | — | no | A05 | Cluster: Rejection No market location could be determined from the combination of two identification criteria |
| from 400 | *The following checks are based on the identification criteria from the request and the hit list based on three criteria from the preceding checks. The hit list contains market locations for which at least one combination of three identification criteria matches the request.* | — | — | — |
| 400 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on three criteria for which a combination of three identification criteria applies? | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| — | — | no | → Step 405 | There are 2..n matches from the combinations of three identification criteria each |
| 405 | Are all five identification criteria contained in the request? | yes | → Step 410 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 420 | — |
| 410 | Combination of [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number), [Name check] (surname or company name), [Device number check] and [MeLo ID check], [Customer number check] | no | → Step 415 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on four criteria |
| 415 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on three criteria with four or more identification criteria? | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| — | — | no | → Step 420 | There are 2..n matches from four identification criteria |
| 420 | Complete [address check] | no | → Step 425 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on the complete address check |
| 425 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on the complete address check with the identification criterion „address“? | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| — | — | no | → Step 430 | — |
| 430 | Complete [name check] | no | → Step 435 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on the complete name check |
| 435 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on the complete name check with the identification criterion „first name and/or last name or company name“ | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| — | — | no | → Step 440 | — |
| 440 | Are 1..n MaLo from the hit list based on three criteria located in the grid area of NB as at the request date? | yes | → Step 445 | 1..n of the determined MaLo are in the grid area of the NB on the request date |
| — | — | no | → Step 450 | None of the determined MaLo lies within the grid area of the NB on the request date |
| 445 | Is only one of the determined market locations not decommissioned as at the request date? | no | A06 | Cluster: Rejection Market location not unique or does not participate in market communication |
| — | — | yes | → Step 720 | — |
| 450 | Can only one MaLo be determined in a grid area handed over within the past three years? | yes | A07 | Cluster: Rejection The determined market location lies in a grid area that was handed over within the last three years. Note: Statement of the MP-ID of the NB to which the grid area was handed over. |
| — | — | no | A08 | Cluster: Rejection No market location could be determined from the combination of three identification criteria |
| 705 | Is the determined market location in the grid area of NB as at the request date? | no | A09 | Cluster: Rejection The determined market location lies in a grid area that was handed over within the last three years. Note: Statement of the MP-ID of the NB to which the grid area was handed over. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 710 | Market location is in the grid area |
| 710 | Is the identified market location a decommissioned market location? | yes | A10 | Cluster: Rejection Identified market location is decommissioned |
| — | — | no | → Step 720 | — |
| 720 | Did the requested party request a power of attorney from the requesting party for the identification? | no | End | Cluster: consent Transfer of the MaLo ID of the identified market location. The response returns the MaLo ID and the complete data record as it is stored at the NB. Note: In the case of a positive response, no response code is transmitted |
| — | — | yes | → Step 730 | Note: The request for a power of attorney in a justified individual case is to be sent bilaterally to the requester. The email address from the SG4 NAD+Z13 contact person switching processes of the communication data sheet of the requester is to be used for this purpose. The response of the requested party is sent to the email address from the SG4 NAD+Z13 contact person switching processes of the communication data sheet of the NB. |
| 730 | Has the power of attorney been received? | yes | → Step 740 | — |
| — | — | no | End | Note: As long as the power of attorney has not arrived at the NB, the process waits at this check step. This check is to be carried out again at regular intervals until the power of attorney has arrived. |
| 740 | Does the NB consider the power of attorney to be effective? | yes | End | Cluster: consent Transfer of the MaLo ID of the identified market location. The response returns the MaLo ID and the complete data record as it is stored at the NB. Note: In the case of a positive response, no response code is transmitted |
| — | — | no | A13 | Cluster: Rejection The power of attorney submitted by the requesting party is regarded as not effective. Note: The NB substantiates the rejection due to the lack of effectiveness of the power of attorney |
## Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| `A14` | Rejection | The "market location ID" or "tranche ID" is not known to the NB. |
| `A01` | Rejection | No market location could be determined with an identification criterion. |
| `A02` | Rejection | No market location could be determined from the combination of two identification criteria Note: The rejection occurs here if there is no market location for which at least one combination of two identification criteria applies the address alone also does not allow unique identification |
| `A03` | Rejection | Market location not unique or does not participate in market communication |
| `A04` | Rejection | The determined market location lies in a grid area transferred within the last three years. Note: Specification of the MP-ID of the NB to which the grid area was transferred. |
| `A05` | Rejection | No market location could be determined from the combination of two identification criteria |
| `A06` | Rejection | Market location not unique or does not participate in market communication |
| `A07` | Rejection | The determined market location lies in a grid area transferred within the last three years. Note: Specification of the MP-ID of the NB to which the grid area was transferred. |
| `A08` | Rejection | No market location could be determined from the combination of three identification criteria |
| `A09` | Rejection | The determined market location lies in a grid area transferred within the last three years. Note: Specification of the MP-ID of the NB to which the grid area was transferred. |
| `A10` | Rejection | Identified market location is decommissioned |
| `A13` | Rejection | The power of attorney submitted by the requesting party is regarded as not effective. Note: The NB gives reasons for the rejection due to the lack of effectiveness of the power of attorney |
:::tip{title="Consistent with the generated process"}
All 12 result codes of the decision tree are contained in the generated process `E_0594.bpmn`.
:::