Subscribing to the market location-specific allocation list Gas — LF view
Process flow from the perspective of the LF
Process steps
Subscribing to the market-location-specific gas allocation list
LF NBCheck identifiers
- 17110 — Request for the allocation list · AS4
Flow
Message to NB · AS4
Write endpoint
- Transaction updated — Update process data
POST /updateProcessData
Updates the existing transaction in the backend once the message has been created.
- Transaction updated — Update process data
Response
LF NBZ33Check identifiers
- 19110 — Rejection of the request for the allocation list · AS4
Flow
Message from NB · AS4
Response per decision tree
19110→ E_0803 · Check subscription
APERAK checks
19110→Z33— APERAK check: Is referenced message known ?
Write endpoint
- Transaction updated — Update process data
POST /updateProcessData
Updates the existing transaction in the backend with the data of the incoming message.
- Transaction updated — Update process data
Decision trees of this process
| EBD | Name |
|---|---|
| E_0803 | Check subscription |
Process information
Other views of the process
The same process through the eyes of the other parties involved: the same steps, each read from their point of view.
- View NB — NB
Notes on this page
The source provides no use case profile for this process — objective, precondition and result are not recorded there.
The steps are the possible messages of this process, not a sequence — the source lists neither conditions nor alternatives. The small box on the step names the own view on the left: with ← it receives, with → it sends. Collapsed steps run between other market partners.
Step sequence reconstructed
For this process, the BNetzA consolidated version carries no sequence diagram. The steps are reconstructed from the BDEW check identifier table: grouped by the designation, ordered by the process step. The method agrees with the consolidated version in 200 of 200 cases that can be cross-checked — the individual line is nevertheless not editorially reviewed. Check it against the rulebook before adopting it into an implementation specification.
The source does not yet name the event that triggers these steps.
Applies to: 1
The connector table lists no write call for these steps. Derived from the process flow: the own role was already involved in this process, so the transaction already exists.
Applies to: 2
For the check identifiers of these steps there is no test case in the test data set; the »Try it out« button of the write interface therefore offers no body.