Complaint about a definition of NB from LF to NB — view NB
The LF or MSB determines that a
- Metering time period definition of NB or
- Switching time definition of NB or
- Power curve definition of NB is not available or appears implausible to it. It submits a complaint about this to NB. The latter checks the incoming complaint and, if the complaint is unfounded, states that the definition is valid.
Process flow from the perspective of the NB
Process steps
Complaint about a definition of the NB
NB LFCheck identifiers
- 17122 — Complaint about a definition · AS4
Flow
Message from LF · AS4
Write endpoint
- Transaction created — Create process data
POST /createProcessData
Creates a new transaction in the backend with the data of the incoming message.
- Transaction created — Create process data
Rejection of the complaint
NB LFCheck identifiers
- 19123 — Rejection of complaint about a definition · AS4
Flow
Load data for processing
LESEN_ANFRAGE_BASISLESEN_AUFTRAG_BASISLESEN_LEISTUNGSKURVENDEFINITION_BASISLESEN_REKLAMATION_BASISLESEN_SCHALTZEITDEFINITION_BASISLESEN_ZAEHLZEITDEFINITION_BASIS
Message to LF · AS4
Response per decision tree
19123→ E_0548 · NB · Check complaint
Write endpoint
- Transaction updated — Update process data
POST /updateProcessData
Updates the existing transaction in the backend once the message has been created.
- Transaction updated — Update process data
Decision trees of this process
| EBD | Name |
|---|---|
| E_0548 | Check complaint |
Process information
Wording of the consolidated version, profile ch. 1.2.7.1, p. 28.
Preconditions
- The LF or MSB is missing a definition or
- a definition appears implausible to the LF or MSB.
Results
- If a definition subject to complaint has to be corrected, the use case “Transmission of a definition of NB by NB” must be carried out for the definition subject to complaint to all LF and MSB to which the definition to be corrected was transmitted.
- If a definition subject to complaint was not transmitted, the use case “Transmission of a definition of NB by NB” must be carried out for the definition subject to complaint to all LF and MSB to which the definition was not transmitted.
Further requirements
In the case of the metering time period definition of the NB: A metering time period definition of the NB can also be complained about by the final customer in his role as LF to the NB if, within the scope of grid usage settlement, the final customer assumes the role of the LF, insofar as these rules apply to him accordingly.
First message
LF sends “Complaint about a definition of the NB” (step 1). From here on, it is the turn of the party involved on this page.
Objective
The LF or MSB has an implausible or missing
- Metering time period definition of NB or
- Switching time definition of NB or
- Power curve definition of NB has been the subject of a complaint.
Other views of the process
The same process through the eyes of the other parties involved: the same steps, each read from their point of view.
- View LF — LF
Notes on this page
The steps are the possible messages of this process, not a sequence — the source lists neither conditions nor alternatives. The small box on the step names the own view on the left: with ← it receives, with → it sends. Collapsed steps run between other market partners.
These read accesses are not listed in the API catalogue of this format version; the step therefore shows only their command, without address and without button.
Applies to: 2
The connector table lists no write call for these steps. Derived from the process flow: the process begins for the own role with their message, so the transaction is created.
Applies to: 1