Complaint about the overview of the definitions of NB from LF to NB — view LF
The LF or MSB determines that the
- Overview of the metering time definitions of the NB or
- Overview of the switching time definitions of the NB or
- Overview of the power curve definitions of the NB is not available or appears implausible to him. He submits a complaint to the NB. The latter checks the incoming complaint and, if the complaint is unfounded, states that the overview is valid.
Process flow from the perspective of the LF
Process steps
Complaint about the overview of the definitions of the NB
LF NBCheck identifiers
- 17122 — Complaint about a definition · AS4
Flow
Prozessauslöser
START_REKLAMATION_DEFINITIONENThe backend triggers this step with this event.
Message to NB · AS4
Write endpoint
- Transaction updated — Update process data
POST /updateProcessData
Updates the existing transaction in the backend once the message has been created.
- Transaction updated — Update process data
Rejection of the complaint
LF NBZ33Check identifiers
- 19123 — Rejection of complaint about a definition · AS4
Flow
Message from NB · AS4
Response per decision tree
19123→ E_0544 · NB · Check complaint
APERAK checks
19123→Z33— APERAK check: Is referenced message known ?
Write endpoint
- Transaction updated — Update process data
POST /updateProcessData
Updates the existing transaction in the backend with the data of the incoming message.
- Transaction updated — Update process data
Decision trees of this process
| EBD | Name |
|---|---|
| E_0544 | Check complaint |
Process information
Wording of the consolidated version, profile ch. 1.2.5.1, pp. 21–22.
Preconditions
- The LF or MSB is missing the overview or
- the overview appears implausible to the LF or MSB.
Results
- If the overview subject to complaint has to be corrected, the use case “Transmission of the overview of the definitions of NB by NB” must be carried out for the overview subject to complaint to all LF and MSB to which the overview to be corrected was transmitted.
- If the overview subject to complaint was not transmitted, the use case “Transmission of the overview of the definitions of NB by NB” must be carried out for the overview subject to complaint to all LF and MSB to which the overview was not transmitted.
Further requirements
In the case of the overview of the metering time definitions of the NB: An overview of the metering time definitions of the NB can also be complained about by the final customer in his role as LF to the NB if, within the scope of grid usage settlement, the final customer assumes the role of the LF, insofar as these rules apply to him accordingly.
First message
The party involved on this page is itself the sender of: „Complaint about the overview of the definitions of the NB“ to NB (step 1).
Objective
The LF or MSB has an implausible or missing
- Overview of the metering time definitions of the NB or
- Overview of the switching time definitions of the NB or
- Overview of the power curve definitions of the NB complained about.
Other views of the process
The same process through the eyes of the other parties involved: the same steps, each read from their point of view.
- View NB — NB
Notes on this page
The steps are the possible messages of this process, not a sequence — the source lists neither conditions nor alternatives. The small box on the step names the own view on the left: with ← it receives, with → it sends. Collapsed steps run between other market partners.
The connector table lists no write call for these steps. Derived from the process flow: the own role was already involved in this process, so the transaction already exists.
Applies to: 2