Complaint about a definition of NB from MSB to NB — view MSB
The LF or MSB determines that a
- Metering time period definition of NB or
- Switching time definition of NB or
- Power curve definition of NB is not available or appears implausible to it. It submits a complaint about this to NB. The latter checks the incoming complaint and, if the complaint is unfounded, states that the definition is valid.
Process flow from the perspective of the MSB
Process steps
Complaint about a definition of the NB
MSB NBCheck identifiers
- 17122 — Complaint about a definition · AS4
Flow
Prozessauslöser
START_REKLAMATION_DEFINITIONThe backend triggers this step with this event.
Message to NB · AS4
Write endpoint
- Transaction updated — Update process data
POST /updateProcessData
Updates the existing transaction in the backend once the message has been created.
- Transaction updated — Update process data
Rejection of the complaint
MSB NBZ33Check identifiers
- 19123 — Rejection of complaint about a definition · AS4
Flow
Message from NB · AS4
Response per decision tree
19123→ E_0549 · NB · Check complaint
APERAK checks
19123→Z33
Write endpoint
- Transaction updated — Update process data
POST /updateProcessData
Updates the existing transaction in the backend with the data of the incoming message.
- Transaction updated — Update process data
Decision trees of this process
| EBD | Name |
|---|---|
| E_0549 | Check complaint |
Process information
Wording of the consolidated version, profile ch. 1.2.7.1, p. 28.
Preconditions
- The LF or MSB is missing a definition or
- a definition appears implausible to the LF or MSB.
Results
- If a definition subject to complaint has to be corrected, the use case “Transmission of a definition of NB by NB” must be carried out for the definition subject to complaint to all LF and MSB to which the definition to be corrected was transmitted.
- If a definition subject to complaint was not transmitted, the use case “Transmission of a definition of NB by NB” must be carried out for the definition subject to complaint to all LF and MSB to which the definition was not transmitted.
Further requirements
In the case of the metering time period definition of the NB: A metering time period definition of the NB can also be complained about by the final customer in his role as LF to the NB if, within the scope of grid usage settlement, the final customer assumes the role of the LF, insofar as these rules apply to him accordingly.
First message
The party involved on this page is itself the sender of: „Complaint about a definition of the NB“ to NB (step 1).
Objective
The LF or MSB has an implausible or missing
- Metering time period definition of NB or
- Switching time definition of NB or
- Power curve definition of NB has been the subject of a complaint.
Other views of the process
The same process through the eyes of the other parties involved: the same steps, each read from their point of view.
- View NB — NB
Notes on this page
The steps are the possible messages of this process, not a sequence — the source lists neither conditions nor alternatives. The small box on the step names the own view on the left: with ← it receives, with → it sends. Collapsed steps run between other market partners.
The connector table lists no write call for these steps. Derived from the process flow: the own role was already involved in this process, so the transaction already exists.
Applies to: 2