E_0549 — Check complaint

Step	Check	Result	Code	Note
10	Does the requester complain about the absence of the rolled-out metering time period definition?	yes	→ Step 20	—
—	—	no	→ Step 40	—
20	Does the code of the metering time period definition match a code from the overview of metering time definitions valid for the disputed time period?	no	A01	Code of the metering time period definition is not used
—	—	yes	→ Step 30	—
30	Was the rolled-out metering time period definition sent to the requesting party?	yes	A02	Rolled-out metering time period definition has been sent Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out metering time period definition was transmitted must be named as a reference.
—	—	no	→ Step 200	—
40	Does the requester complain about an implausible rolled-out metering time period definition?	yes	→ Step 50	—
—	—	no	→ Step 70	—
50	Has a rolled-out metering time period definition with a higher version already been sent with the code of the metering time period definition?	yes	A03	A rolled-out metering time period definition with a higher version has already been sent for the metering time period definition code Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out metering time period definition was transmitted must be named as the reference.
—	—	no	→ Step 60	—
60	Is the transmitted rolled-out metering time period definition plausible?	yes	A04	Rolled-out metering time period definition is plausible
—	—	no	→ Step 200	—
70	Does the requester complain about the absence of the rolled-out switching time definition?	yes	→ Step 80	—
—	—	no	→ Step 100	—
80	Does the code of the switching time definition match a code from the overview of switching time definitions valid for the disputed time period?	no	A05	Code of the switching time definition is not used
—	—	yes	→ step 90	—
90	Was the rolled-out switching time definition sent to the requesting party?	yes	A06	Rolled-out switching time definition has been sent Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out switching time definition was transmitted must be named as a reference.
—	—	no	→ Step 200	—
100	Does the MSB complain about an implausible rolled-out switching time definition?	yes	→ Step 110	—
—	—	no	→ Step 130	—
110	Has a rolled-out switching time definition with a higher version already been sent with the code of the switching time definition?	yes	A07	A rolled-out switching time definition with a higher version has already been sent for the switching time definition code Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out switching time definition was transmitted must be named as the reference.
—	—	no	→ Step 120	—
120	Is the transmitted rolled-out switching time definition plausible?	yes	A08	Rolled-out switching time definition is plausible
—	—	no	→ Step 200	—
130	Does the requester complain about the absence of the rolled-out power curve definition?	yes	→ Step 140	—
—	—	no	→ Step 160	—
140	Does the code of the power curve definition match a code from the overview of power curve definitions valid for the disputed time period?	no	A09	Code of the power curve definition is not used
—	—	yes	→ Step 150	—
150	Was the rolled-out power curve definition sent to the requesting party?	yes	A10	Rolled-out power curve definition has been sent Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out power curve definition was transmitted must be named as a reference.
—	—	no	→ Step 200	—
160	Does the requester complain about an implausible rolled-out power curve definition?	yes	→ Step 170	—
—	—	no	→ Step 200	—
170	Has a rolled-out power curve definition with a higher version already been sent with the code of the power curve definition?	yes	A11	A rolled-out power curve definition with a higher version has already been sent for the power curve definition code Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out power curve definition was transmitted must be named as the reference.
—	—	no	→ Step 180	—
180	Is the transmitted rolled-out power curve definition plausible?	yes	A12	Rolled-out power curve definition is plausible
—	—	no	→ Step 200	—
200	Has a previously unspecified error occurred?	yes	A99	Rejection Other Note: The identified problem must be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.04.2027 00:00
—	—	no	End	Correct the definition and carry out the transmission again.