LF (54)
E_0550 — Check complaint
Check complaint
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Check complaint |
| Market role | LF |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | GPKE |
| Section | 6.44.1: AD: Complaint about a definition of the LF from NB to LF |
| Check identifiers | checked: 17122 · response: 19123 |
| EBD version | 4.2 |
| As at | 2026-06-23 |
Decision tree
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | Does the sender complain about the absence of the rolled-out switching time definition? | yes | → Step 30 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 50 | — |
| 30 | Does the code of the switching time definition match a code from the overview of switching time definitions valid for the disputed time period? | no | A01 | Code of the switching time definition is not used |
| — | — | yes | → Step 40 | — |
| 40 | Was the rolled-out switching time definition sent to the requesting party? | yes | A02 | Rolled-out switching time definition has been sent Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out switching time definition was transmitted must be named as a reference. |
| — | — | no | → Step 200 | — |
| 50 | Does the requester complain about an implausible rolled-out switching time definition? | yes | → Step 60 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 100 | — |
| 60 | Has a rolled-out switching time definition with a higher version already been sent with the code of the switching time definition? | yes | A03 | A rolled-out switching time definition with a higher version has already been sent for the switching time definition code Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out switching time definition was transmitted must be named as the reference. |
| — | — | no | → Step 70 | — |
| 70 | Is the transmitted rolled-out switching time definition plausible? | yes | A04 | Rolled-out switching time definition is plausible |
| — | — | no | → Step 200 | — |
| 100 | Does the requester complain about the absence of the rolled-out power curve definition? | yes | → Step 120 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 140 | — |
| 120 | Does the code of the power curve definition match a code from the overview of power curve definitions valid for the disputed time period? | no | A05 | Code of the power curve definition is not used |
| — | — | yes | → Step 130 | — |
| 130 | Was the rolled-out power curve definition sent to the requesting party? | yes | A06 | Rolled-out power curve definition has been sent Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out power curve definition was transmitted must be named as a reference. |
| — | — | no | → Step 200 | — |
| 140 | Does the requester complain about an implausible rolled-out power curve definition? | yes | → Step 150 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 200 | — |
| 150 | Has a rolled-out power curve definition with a higher version already been sent with the code of the power curve definition? | yes | A07 | A rolled-out power curve definition with a higher version has already been sent for the power curve definition code Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out power curve definition was transmitted must be named as the reference. |
| — | — | no | → Step 160 | — |
| 160 | Is the transmitted rolled-out power curve definition plausible? | yes | A08 | Rolled-out power curve definition is plausible |
| — | — | no | → Step 200 | — |
| 200 | Has a previously unspecified error occurred? | yes | A99 | Other Note: The identified problem is to be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.10.2026 00:00 |
| — | — | no | End | Correct the definition and carry out the transmission again. |
Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
A01 | — | Code of the switching time definition is not used |
A02 | — | Rolled-out switching time definition has been sent Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out switching time definition was transmitted must be named as a reference. |
A03 | — | A rolled-out switching time definition with a higher version has already been sent for the switching time definition code Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out switching time definition was transmitted must be named as the reference. |
A04 | — | Rolled-out switching time definition is plausible |
A05 | — | Code of the power curve definition is not used |
A06 | — | Rolled-out power curve definition has been sent Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out power curve definition was transmitted must be named as a reference. |
A07 | — | A rolled-out power curve definition with a higher version has already been sent for the power curve definition code Note: The business transaction with which the rolled-out power curve definition was transmitted must be named as the reference. |
A08 | — | Rolled-out power curve definition is plausible |
A99 | — | Other Note: The identified problem is to be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.10.2026 00:00 |
Notes on this page
Role of the numbers: »response« are the check identifiers that list this tree in the ebd_code column of the check identifier table (knowledge-collection · FV 202604); »checked« is the difference set to it from the return path of the process steps.
Consistent with the generated process
All 9 result codes of the decision tree are contained in the generated process E_0550.bpmn.