LF (54)
E_0456 — Check delivery note
Check delivery note
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Check delivery note |
| Market role | LF |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | GPKE |
| Section | 6.9.1: AD: Transmission of the delivery note for grid usage settlement |
| Check identifiers | checked: 13016, 13019 · response: 21035 |
| EBD version | 4.3 |
| As at | — |
Decision tree
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Is the market location a consuming market location? | no | A01 | Cluster: Rejection No delivery note is to be sent for this market location. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 2 | — |
| 2 | Is the end date of the period of the delivery note in the future? | yes | A02 | Cluster: Rejection End date is in the future. |
| — | — | no | → Step 3 | — |
| 3 | Does the type of this delivery note (basic price/energy price or energy price/demand price) for the transmitted time period match the grid usage billing variant stored at the market location (basic price/energy price or energy price/demand price), which is derived from the article ID or group article ID if the grid usage billing variant was not exchanged explicitly via corresponding codes? | no | A03 | Cluster: Rejection The type of the delivery note is not identical to the grid usage billing variant. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 4 | — |
| 4 | Is this a delivery note of the type „base/ energy price“? | yes | → Step 5 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 14 | — |
| 5 | Does the period stated in the delivery note contain at least one day of a delivery note that has not yet been cancelled? | yes | A04 | Cluster: Rejection Overlapping time period in delivery notes not yet cancelled „energy price/basic price“ |
| — | — | no | → Step 6 | — |
| 6 | Is this a market location with the metering classification „no metering“ (flat-rate market location)? | yes | → Step 7 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 8 | — |
| 7 | Does the energy quantity transmitted in the delivery note match the energy quantity resulting from the annual consumption forecast previously exchanged for the time period? | yes | A05 | Cluster: Consent Consent |
| — | — | no | A06 | Cluster: Rejection Energy quantity for flat-rate market location does not match. |
| 8 | After a complaint with MSB, are the energy quantities at the market location from MSB available for the corresponding period of the delivery note? Note: If the energy quantities at the market location from MSB are not available for the corresponding period, a complaint about them must first have been raised by LF with MSB before this question may be answered with no. | no | A07 | Cluster: Rejection Energy quantities from the MSB at the market location are missing and have been claimed with the MSB Note: For service periods before 01.12.2019 the delivery note is checked on the basis of the values transmitted by the NB or by the gMSB. See Communication No. 6 on the MaKo 2020 (ref.: BK6-18-032) of the Bundesnetzagentur dated 28.01.2020. |
| — | — | yes | → step 9 | — |
| 9 | Is there an additional energy quantity for the period stated in the delivery note for one of the stated OBIS key figures that has not yet been cancelled? | yes | A08 | Cluster: Rejection For one time segment there are several energy quantities for at least one OBIS code. |
| — | — | no | → Step 10 | — |
| 10 | Does the sum of the energy quantities per OBIS code previously transmitted by the MSB match the sum of the energy quantities of the corresponding OBIS code from the delivery note for the time period covered by the delivery note? | yes | A05 | Cluster: Consent Consent |
| — | — | no | → Step 11 | — |
| 11 | Is this a market location whose grid usage is billed, on the basis of contractual agreements, differently from the rules described in GPKE Part 2 Chapter 3.2.2? | yes | → Step 12 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 13 | — |
| 12 | Does the energy quantity transmitted in the delivery note match the energy quantity resulting from the contractual agreements? | yes | A05 | Cluster: Consent Consent |
| — | — | no | A09 | Cluster: Rejection Energy quantity contradicts the contractually agreed logic. |
| 13 | Does the sum of the energy quantities previously transmitted by the MSB match the sum of the energy quantities from the delivery note for the time period covered by the delivery note? | yes | A05 | Cluster: Consent Consent |
| — | — | no | A10 | Cluster: Rejection Energy quantities do not match. |
| 14 | Is this a market location with the metering classification „no metering“ (flat-rate market location)? | yes | → Step 15 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 16 | — |
| 15 | Does the energy quantity from the delivery note match the bilateral contractual agreements? | yes | A05 | Cluster: Consent Consent |
| — | — | no | A11 | Cluster: Rejection Energy quantity for flat-rate market location does not match. |
| 16 | After a complaint, are the load curves at the market location from MSB and, where applicable, the maximum demand (for iMS from MSB, for kME with RLM taken from the load curve from LF, and in the case of a supplier switch during the year from NB) available for the corresponding period of the delivery note? Note: If the load curves at the market location from MSB are not available for the corresponding period of the delivery note, a complaint about them must first have been raised by LF with MSB before this question may be answered with no. | no | A12 | Cluster: Rejection Load curves from the MSB at the market location are missing and have been claimed with the MSB, or the message „Energy and maximum demand of the calendar year before start of supply" from the NB is missing. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 17 | — |
| 17 | Is this a market location whose grid usage is billed, on the basis of contractual agreements, differently from the rules described in GPKE Part 2 Chapter 3.2.2? | yes | → Step 18 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 19 | — |
| 18 | Does the energy quantity or the maximum demand from the delivery note match the bilateral contractual agreements? | yes | A05 | Cluster: Consent Consent |
| — | — | no | A13 | Cluster: Rejection The energy quantity or maximum demand from the delivery note does not correspond to the contractually agreed energy quantity. |
| 19 | Is this a market location with the metering classification „iMS“? | yes | → Step 20 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 21 | — |
| 20 | Does the maximum demand transmitted in the delivery note match the maximum demand previously transmitted by the MSB or the maximum demand transmitted by the NB to the LF in the case of a supplier switch during the year? | no | A14 | Cluster: Rejection The maximum demand from the delivery note is not identical to the maximum demand on record. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 22 | — |
| 21 | Does the maximum demand transmitted in the delivery note match the maximum demand available at the LF, which is taken from the load curve of the MSB, or the maximum demand transmitted by the NB to the LF in the case of a supplier switch during the year? | no | A15 | Cluster: Rejection Maximum demand not plausible |
| — | — | yes | → Step 22 | — |
| 22 | Does every energy quantity occurring on the delivery note per line item (OBIS code and time period) match a sum of the ¼ h values previously transmitted by the MSB, taking possible commercial rounding into account, where the energy quantities from the energy and demand values of the NB measured so far were taken into account if applicable? | yes | A05 | Cluster: Consent Consent |
| — | — | no | A16 | Cluster: Rejection The energy quantity from the delivery note does not correspond to the sum from the load curve. |
Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
A01 | Rejection | No delivery note is to be sent for this market location. |
A02 | Rejection | End date is in the future. |
A03 | Rejection | The type of the delivery note is not identical to the grid usage billing variant. |
A04 | Rejection | Overlapping time period in not yet canceled delivery notes “energy price/base price” |
A05 (7 outputs) | Consent | Consent |
A06 | Rejection | Energy quantity for flat-rate market location does not match. |
A07 | Rejection | Energy quantities from the MSB at the market location are missing and have been claimed with the MSB Note: For service periods before 01.12.2019, the delivery note is checked on the basis of the values transmitted by the NB or by the gMSB. See notice no. 6 on the MaKo 2020 (ref.: BK6-18-032) of the Bundesnetzagentur dated 28.01.2020. |
A08 | Rejection | Several energy quantities exist for at least one OBIS code within one time segment. |
A09 | Rejection | Energy quantity contradicts the contractually agreed logic. |
A10 | Rejection | Energy quantities do not match. |
A11 | Rejection | Energy quantity for flat-rate market location does not match. |
A12 | Rejection | Load curves from the MSB at the market location are missing and a complaint has been raised with the MSB, or the message „Energy and maximum demand calendar year before start of supply" is missing from the NB. |
A13 | Rejection | Energy quantity or maximum demand from the delivery note does not match the contractually agreed energy quantity. |
A14 | Rejection | The maximum demand from the delivery note is not identical to the available maximum demand. |
A15 | Rejection | Maximum demand implausible |
A16 | Rejection | Energy quantity from the delivery note does not match the sum from the load curve. |
Notes on this page
Role of the numbers: »response« are the check identifiers that list this tree in the ebd_code column of the check identifier table (knowledge-collection · FV 202610); »checked« is the difference set to it from the return path of the process steps.
Consistent with the generated process
All 16 result codes of the decision tree are contained in the generated process E_0456.bpmn.