LF (54)
E_1007 — Check invoice for a miscellaneous service (Based on electricity EBD: E_0503_Check invoice for a miscellaneous service)
Check invoice for another service (Based on electricity EBD: E_0503_Check invoice for a miscellaneous service)
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Check invoice for a miscellaneous service (Based on electricity EBD: E_0503_Check invoice for a miscellaneous service) |
| Market role | LF |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | Disconnection processes gas |
| Section | 18.1.1: AD: Billing of a miscellaneous service |
| Check identifiers | Response: 33002 |
| EBD version | 4.2 |
| As at | 2026-06-23 |
Decision tree
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Is this an invoice for „late payment charges“? | yes | → Step 30 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 20 | — |
| 20 | Does the invoice meet further requirements pursuant to §14 Abs. 4 UStG? | no | A01 | Cluster: Rejection Invoice does not comply with §14 Abs. 4 UStG. Note: The rejection must be substantiated. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 30 | — |
| 30 | Is the invoice date ≤ the receipt date? | no | A02 | Cluster: Rejection Invoice date is in the future |
| — | — | yes | → Step 40 | — |
| 40 | Does the invoice number used in this invoice already exist from the invoice issuer? | yes | A03 | Cluster: Rejection Invoice number has already been used. |
| — | — | no | → Step 50 | — |
| 50 | Is there a calculation error in the invoice? | yes | A04 | Cluster: Rejection There is a calculation error. |
| — | — | no | → Step 70 | — |
| 70 | Is the due date deadline undercut? Note: undercut due date means: payment term ≤ 10 WT from the invoice receipt date | yes | A05 | Cluster: Rejection The payment term falls below the minimum. |
| — | — | no | → step 90 | — |
| 90 | Is this an invoice for „late payment charges“? | yes | → Step 270 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 100 | Note: This is an invoice for interruption / restoration of grid connection use. |
| 100 | Are the line items billed with the correct tax rate? | no | A07 | Cluster: Rejection At least one of the items has been billed with the incorrect tax rate |
| — | — | yes | → Step 120 | — |
| 120 | Is a valid price sheet “price sheet disconnect / reconnect and late payment charges” available for the billing point in time? | no | A08 | Cluster: Rejection The supplier has no valid price sheet „Price sheet disconnect / reconnect and late payment charges“. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 130 | — |
| 130 | Did the supplier order a disconnection order with the order number of the disconnection order stated in the invoice? | no | A09 | Cluster: Rejection The disconnection order to be billed is not known. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 140 | — |
| 140 | Has the disconnection order already been billed? | yes | → Step 150 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 160 | — |
| 150 | Has this invoice for the disconnection order been cancelled again? | no | A10 | Cluster: Rejection The disconnection order has already been billed (duplicate invoice). |
| — | — | yes | → Step 160 | — |
| 160 | Has the identified disconnection order been cancelled and the cancellation confirmed? | yes | → Step 170 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 190 | Note: The disconnection order was not canceled or the cancellation was made too late and was therefore rejected. |
| 170 | Is article ID [2-01-7-004] (cancellation of an order to interrupt grid connection use up to the day before the disconnection) or article ID [2-01-7-005] (cancellation of an order to interrupt grid connection use on the day of the disconnection) billed in the invoice? | no | A11 | Cluster: Rejection The billed article does not correspond to the service to be billed for a cancelled order for the interruption of the grid connection use. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 180 | — |
| 180 | Does the price in the invoice match the price from the price sheet? | no | A12 | Cluster: Rejection Price in the invoice does not match the price “Cancellation of an order to interrupt grid connection use” on the price sheet, or the article ID is not named in the price sheet. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 440 | — |
| 190 | Was the disconnection from the disconnection order successful? | yes | → Step 200 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 250 | Note: Disconnection was not successful. |
| 200 | Has the supplier already ordered the restoration of the grid connection use for the interruption of the grid connection use implemented from this order? | yes | → Step 210 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 220 | — |
| 210 | Was the reconnection ordered by the supplier with the option “reconnection also outside regular working hours”? | yes | → Step 230 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 220 | — |
| 220 | Are both article IDs [2-01-7-001] (interruption of grid connection use during regular working hours) and [2-01-7-002] (restoration of grid connection use during regular working hours) billed in the invoice? | no | A13 | Cluster: Rejection The billed article ID(s) do(es) not correspond to the service to be billed for an interruption and restoration of the grid connection use. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 240 | — |
| 230 | Is article ID [2-01-7-001] (interruption of grid connection use during regular working hours) and, in addition, exactly one of the two article IDs [2-01-7-002] (restoration of grid connection use during regular working hours) or [2-01-7-006] (restoration of grid connection use outside regular working hours) billed in the invoice? | no | A14 | Cluster: Rejection The billed article ID(s) do(es) not correspond to the service to be billed for an interruption and restoration of the grid connection use. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 240 | — |
| 240 | Do the prices in the invoice match the prices from the price sheet? | no | A15 | Cluster: Rejection At least one price in the invoice does not match the price for an interruption and restoration of the grid connection use on the price sheet, or at least one article ID is not named in the price sheet |
| — | — | yes | → Step 440 | — |
| 250 | Is article ID [2-01-7-003] (unsuccessful interruption) billed in the invoice? | no | A16 | Cluster: Rejection The billed article does not correspond to the service to be billed for an unsuccessful interruption |
| — | — | yes | → Step 260 | — |
| 260 | Does the price in the invoice match the price from the price sheet? | no | A17 | Cluster: Rejection Price in the invoice does not match the price for an unsuccessful interruption on the price sheet, or the article ID is not named in the price sheet |
| — | — | yes | → Step 330 | — |
| 270 | Is a valid price sheet “price sheet disconnect / reconnect and late payment charges” available for the billing point in time? | no | A18 | Cluster: Rejection The supplier has no valid price sheet for the late payment charges |
| — | — | yes | → Step 280 | — |
| 280 | Does the supplier have the invoice to which the late payment charges invoice relates? | no | A19 | Cluster: Rejection The invoice to which the late payment charges invoice refers is not known. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 290 | — |
| 290 | Is article ID [2-02-0-001] (flat-rate late payment charges) or article ID [2-02-0-002] (variable late payment charges) billed in the invoice? | no | A20 | Cluster: Rejection The billed article does not correspond to the service to be billed for late payment charges |
| — | — | yes | → Step 300 | — |
| 300 | Are the late payment charges justified? | no | A21 | Cluster: Rejection The late payment charges are not justified |
| — | — | yes | → Step 310 | — |
| 310 | Are the late payment charges billed as a flat rate with article ID [2-02-0-001] (late payment charges, flat rate)? | no | → Step 330 | Note: The late payment charges are billed variably with the article ID [2-02-0-002] |
| — | — | yes | → Step 320 | — |
| 320 | Does the price in the invoice match the price from the price sheet? | no | A22 | Cluster: Rejection Price in the invoice does not match the price for late payment charges on the price sheet, or the article ID is not named in the price sheet |
| — | — | yes | → Step 440 | — |
| 330 | Do the late payment charges asserted comply with the statutory provisions? | no | A23 | Cluster: Rejection Price is not reasonable in amount |
| — | — | yes | → Step 440 | — |
| 440 | Has a previously unspecified error occurred? | no | End | Send remittance advice |
| — | — | yes | A99 | Cluster: Rejection Other Note: The identified problem must be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.10.2026 00:00 |
Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
A01 | Rejection | Invoice does not comply with §14 Abs. 4 UStG. Note: The rejection must be justified. |
A02 | Rejection | Invoice date is in the future |
A03 | Rejection | Invoice number has already been used. |
A04 | Rejection | There is a calculation error. |
A05 | Rejection | The payment term is undercut. |
A07 | Rejection | At least one of the line items is billed at the wrong tax rate |
A08 | Rejection | The supplier does not have a valid price sheet “Price sheet disconnect / reconnect and late payment charges”. |
A09 | Rejection | The disconnection order to be billed is not known. |
A10 | Rejection | The disconnection order has already been billed (duplicate invoice). |
A11 | Rejection | The billed article does not correspond to the service to be billed for a cancelled order to interrupt the grid connection use. |
A12 | Rejection | Price in the invoice does not match the price „Cancellation of an order to interrupt grid connection use“ on the price sheet, or the article ID is not named on the price sheet. |
A13 | Rejection | The billed article ID(s) do not correspond to the service to be billed for an interruption and restoration of grid connection use. |
A14 | Rejection | The billed article ID(s) do not correspond to the service to be billed for an interruption and restoration of grid connection use. |
A15 | Rejection | At least one price in the invoice does not match the price for an interruption and restoration of the grid connection use on the price sheet, or at least one article ID is not stated on the price sheet |
A16 | Rejection | The billed article does not correspond to the service to be billed for an unsuccessful interruption |
A17 | Rejection | Price in the invoice does not match the price for an unsuccessful interruption on the price sheet, or the article ID is not named on the price sheet |
A18 | Rejection | The supplier does not have a valid price sheet for the late payment charges |
A19 | Rejection | The invoice to which the late payment charges invoice refers is not known. |
A20 | Rejection | The billed article does not correspond to the service to be billed for late payment charges |
A21 | Rejection | The late payment charges are not justified |
A22 | Rejection | Price in the invoice does not match the price for late payment charges on the price sheet, or the article ID is not named on the price sheet |
A23 | Rejection | Price is not appropriate in amount |
A99 | Rejection | Other Note: The identified problem is to be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.10.2026 00:00 |
Notes on this page
Role of the numbers: »response« are the check identifiers that list this tree in the ebd_code column of the check identifier table (knowledge-collection · FV 202604); »checked« is the difference set to it from the return path of the process steps.
Not checked against a process
No consistency check was carried out for this decision tree — no generated BPMN found. Whether the MACO APP implements this tree completely is therefore not evidenced here.