MSB (55 / 54)
E_0252 — Check request
Check request
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Check request |
| Market role | MSB |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | WiM electricity |
| Section | 8.25.1: AD: Request and order placement of values by ESA |
| Check identifiers | Response: 21033 |
| EBD version | 4.2 |
| As at | 2026-06-23 |
Decision tree
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Is the metering product requested by the ESA marked as “mandatory” in the code list of the configurations? | no | → Step 2 | — |
| — | — | yes | → Step 3 | — |
| 2 | Is the metering product requested by the ESA offered in accordance with the code list of configurations? | no | A02 | Cluster: Rejection The metering product requested by the ESA is not offered by the MSB. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 3 | — |
| 3 | Does MSB have the contractual basis for the request and transmission of the values and the billing of the service rendered by MSB to ESA? | no | A03 | Cluster: Rejection The contractual basis of the ESA does not exist. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 4 | — |
| 4 | Does MSB have valid consent under data protection law (such as the BDEW template “Declaration of consent to the processing of personal data pursuant to DS-GVO - Request and transmission of metering products in accordance with the BNetzA regulatory determination BK6-20-160”) for the request and transmission of metering products? | no | A04 | Cluster: Rejection The signed consent for the location is not available. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 5 | — |
| 5 | Are the data in the consent plausible and complete? | no | A05 | Cluster: Rejection The consent provided is not plausible or complete. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 6 | — |
| 6 | Does the existing device technology enable the transmission of the requested values in accordance with the metering product? | no | A06 | Cluster: Rejection The device technology does not measure the requested meter reading values. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 7 | — |
| 7 | Is this a request for values at the level of the market location / tranche / grid location? | yes | → Step 8 | — |
| — | — | no | End | Create quotation for the request |
| 8 | Is the MSB also the MSB of the metering location(s) at all metering locations assigned to the market location (incl. tranche) / grid location? | no | A07 | Cluster: Rejection The MSB of the market location / grid location is not at the same time the MSB assigned to all metering location(s). |
| — | — | yes | End | Create quotation for the request |
Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
A02 | Rejection | The metering product requested by the ESA is not offered by the MSB. |
A03 | Rejection | No contractual basis exists for the ESA. |
A04 | Rejection | The signed consent for the location is not available. |
A05 | Rejection | The consent provided is not plausible or complete. |
A06 | Rejection | The device technology does not measure the requested meter reading values. |
A07 | Rejection | The MSB of the market location / grid location is not at the same time the MSB assigned to all metering location(s). |
Notes on this page
Role of the numbers: »response« are the check identifiers that list this tree in the ebd_code column of the check identifier table (knowledge-collection · FV 202604); »checked« is the difference set to it from the return path of the process steps.
Not checked against a process
No consistency check was carried out for this decision tree — no generated BPMN found. Whether the MACO APP implements this tree completely is therefore not evidenced here.