MSB (55 / 54)
E_0286 — Carry out metering location change
Perform metering location change
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Carry out metering location change |
| Market role | MSB |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | Processes for changing the technical equipment at locations |
| Section | 9.1.3: AD: Metering location change from the NB to the MSB |
| Check identifiers | Response: 21025, 21027 |
| EBD version | 4.2 |
| As at | 2026-06-23 |
Decision tree
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Is access to the location available for the technician to carry out the change at the location? | no | A01 | Failed The technician has no access to the location. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 20 | — |
| 20 | Is it necessary to set up a new communication connection in order to execute the order placement? | no | → Step 40 | — |
| — | — | yes | → Step 30 | — |
| 30 | Can the communication connection be established so that the order placement can be executed? | no | A02 | Failed The change of the technology at the location is not possible because of a missing / faulty communication connection. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 40 | — |
| 40 | Is the change an order placement for a control? | no | → Step 60 | — |
| — | — | yes | → Step 50 | — |
| 50 | Is the mapping of the SR/NeLo to TR feasible? Note: This is not possible, for example, if the ordered entity between SR/NeLo and TR cannot be implemented because of the connection station of the control system present on site. This may be the case, for example, if one SR was ordered for several TR, but on site only digital interfaces are available at the TR, which can therefore only be mapped technically in a 1-to-1 relationship, or conversely, if the NB has ordered a 1-to-1 relationship of SR to TR but on site several TR are wired in analog fashion to one SR. It may likewise occur that the customer has a Home Energy Management System (HEMS) on site and no SR/TR implementation is possible, but only a NeLo/TR (or vice versa). | no | A03 | Failed The ordered assignment of the stated TR to the SR/NeLo cannot be implemented because of the situation on site. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 60 | — |
| 60 | Has a previously unspecified error occurred? | yes | A99 | Failed Other Note: The identified problem must be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.10.2026 00:00 |
| — | — | no | End | Send master data change originating from the MSB (responsible). Where applicable, processing and transmission of values from the MSB of the metering location. |
Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
A01 | — | Failed The technician has no access to the location. |
A02 | — | Failed The change of the technology at the location is not possible because of a missing / faulty communication connection. |
A03 | — | Failed The ordered assignment of the stated TR to the SR/NeLo cannot be implemented because of the situation on site. |
A99 | — | Failed Other Note: The identified problem must be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.10.2026 00:00 |
Notes on this page
Role of the numbers: »response« are the check identifiers that list this tree in the ebd_code column of the check identifier table (knowledge-collection · FV 202604); »checked« is the difference set to it from the return path of the process steps.
Not checked against a process
No consistency check was carried out for this decision tree — no generated BPMN found. Whether the MACO APP implements this tree completely is therefore not evidenced here.