NB (69)
E_0622 — Check whether the registration can be rejected directly
Check whether the registration can be rejected directly
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Check whether the registration can be rejected directly |
| Market role | NB |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | GPKE |
| Section | 6.6.1: AD: Start of supply |
| Check identifiers | checked: 55001 · response: 55003 |
| Check identifiers | checked: 55077 · response: 55080 |
| EBD version | 4.2 |
| As at | 2026-06-23 |
Decision tree
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Was the use case used for a consuming market location or a dormant market location? | yes | → Step 15 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 220 | — |
| 15 | Was the lead time met? | no | A07 | Cluster: Rejection Lead time was not met |
| — | — | yes | → Step 16 | — |
| 16 | Is „dormant market location“ specified in the supplement to the transaction reason in the use case? | no | → Step 30 | — |
| — | — | yes | → Step 18 | — |
| 18 | Is the „dormant market location“ (SG5 LOC+Z22) a consuming market location in the recipient's system? | no | A09 | Cluster: Rejection The registered dormant market location is not a consuming market location |
| — | — | yes | → Step 19 | — |
| 19 | Is the specified market location intended to result in the creation of a new customer installation (product code: 9991 00000 276 9, product property code: 9991 00000 293 3 or 9991 00000 321 2)? | yes | → Step 20 | Note: In this case the LF intends to newly form a customer installation into which the stated market location is to be integrated. |
| — | — | no | → Step 25 | Note: In this case the LF intends to integrate a market location into an existing market location „Mapping of § 20 (1d) EnWG or § 10c EEG“ |
| 20 | Is the customer installation to be formed a customer installation pursuant to § 20 para. 1d EnWG or § 10c EEG whose energy quantities are determined by calculation using a virtual summation meter? | yes | → Step 22 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 30 | — |
| 22 | Is the “dormant market location” (SG5 LOC+Z22) metered by means of iMS (metering classification of the market location = iMS)? | no | A47 | Cluster: Rejection The stated market location does not meet the requirements, because the metering classification is not iMS. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 30 | — |
| 25 | Is the market location named in the use case (in SG5 LOC+Z16) a „customer installation“ market location (§ 20 para. 1d EnWG or § 10 c EEG)? | no | A08 | Cluster: Rejection The market location named in the registration (in the SG5 LOC+Z16) is not a „customer installation“. The market location to be integrated (in the SG5 LOC+Z22) can therefore not be assigned to the „customer installation“ market location (in the SG5 LOC+Z16). |
| — | — | yes | → Step 26 | — |
| 26 | Is the „dormant market location (SG5 LOC+Z22) located behind the same grid location(s) as the market location of the customer installation (SG5 LOC+Z16)? | no | A37 | Cluster: Rejection The market location to be integrated is not located behind the same grid location(s) as the market location of the „customer installation“ („mapping of § 20 Abs. 1d EnWG or § 10c EEG“). |
| — | — | yes | → Step 27 | — |
| 27 | Is the existing customer installation (SG5 LOC+Z16) a „customer installation“ (§ 20 para. 1d EnWG or § 10 c EEG) whose energy quantities are determined by calculation using a virtual summation meter? | yes | → Step 28 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 30 | — |
| 28 | Is the “dormant market location” (SG5 LOC+Z22) metered by means of iMS (metering classification of the market location = iMS)? | no | A46 | Cluster: Rejection The market location to be integrated does not meet the requirements, because the metering classification is not iMS. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 30 | — |
| 30 | Does the market location participate in market communication on the registration date? Note: market locations that do not participate in market communication are market locations that are decommissioned or market locations assigned to the "Model 2 for the option of charging-process-specific balancing allocation of energy quantities". | no | A02 | Cluster: Rejection The market location identified via the market location ID does not participate in market communication. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 50 | — |
| 50 | Is this a registration for a creation? Note: These are market locations for which the NB has already assigned the identifier but whose commissioning still lies in the future. (so a start of supply has not yet been determined). | yes | A04 | Cluster: Rejection Incorrect process |
| — | — | no | → Step 60 | — |
| 60 | Are all mandatory requirements of the LF met? Note: In particular, the required allocation authorization (balancing group/balancing procedure) is available | no | A05 | Cluster: Rejection Requirements cannot be met Note: the deviations must be named |
| — | — | yes | → Step 70 | — |
| 70 | Is there already a registration for this market location that is currently in progress and has not yet been answered? | yes | A06 | Cluster: Rejection Another registration is being processed. Note: The allocation start of the registration currently being processed and the point in time from which the NB will again accept registrations for this market location are transmitted. |
| — | — | no | End | EBD E_0621_Check whether a request to terminate the assignment is required |
| 220 | Is this a „move-in to a creation“? Note: These are market locations for which the NB has already assigned the identifier but whose commissioning still lies in the future (so a start of supply has not yet been determined). | yes | A21 | Cluster: Rejection Incorrect process |
| — | — | no | → Step 250 | — |
| 250 | Is the metering technology for quarter-hourly measurement available at all metering devices required to determine the energy quantity of the market location? Note: If the configuration for a quarter-hourly resolution does not yet exist, this configuration is set up via the UC “Setting up the configurations on the basis of an assignment of a LF to a market location or tranche”, which is called from this UC (start of supply), provided that the corresponding product was ordered by LF in SD step 1. | no | A24 | Cluster: Rejection Not all metering devices required for determining the energy quantity of the market location have the metering technology for quarter-hourly measurement. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 260 | — |
| 260 | Are all mandatory requirements of the LF met? Note: In particular, the required allocation authorization (balancing group/balancing procedure) is available | no | A25 | Cluster: Rejection Requirements cannot be met Note: the deviations must be named |
| — | — | yes | → Step 270 | — |
| 270 | Is there already a registration for this market location that is currently in progress and has not yet been answered? | yes | A45 | Cluster: Rejection Another registration is being processed. Note: The allocation start of the registration currently being processed and the point in time from which the NB will again accept registrations for this market location. |
| — | — | no | → Step 300 | — |
| 300 | Is this business transaction 1? | yes | → Step 400 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 310 | — |
| 310 | Is this business transaction 2? | yes | → Step 600 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 800 | — |
| 400 | Does the marketing type stated in the business transaction change as of the day of the requested allocation start (change of marketing type)? | yes | → Step 410 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 405 | — |
| 405 | Is this a „non-EEG-/- KWKG“ market location? | yes | → Step 406 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 410 | — |
| 406 | Is the transmission day no later than the day before the last WT before the allocation start? | yes | End | EBD E_0621_Check whether a request to terminate the assignment is required |
| — | — | no | A34 | Cluster: Rejection The lead time for a „non-EEG-/ - KWKG“ market location was not met. |
| 410 | Is the specified date “Start of supply” the 1st of a calendar month, 00:00? | yes | → Step 420 | — |
| — | — | no | A27 | Cluster: Rejection Requirements of EEG not met. |
| 420 | Is this a shortened switch? Note: Requirement per EEG: 5 WT before allocation start | yes | → Step 440 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 430 | — |
| 430 | Is the lead time of one month met? | yes | End | EBD E_0621_Check whether a request to terminate the assignment is required |
| — | — | no | A28 | Cluster: Rejection The lead time for EEG/KWKG market locations in business transaction 1 was not met (deadline exceeded). |
| 440 | Is the lead time met? (received no later than 5 WT before the allocation start) | yes | End | EBD E_0621_Check whether a request to terminate the assignment is required |
| — | — | no | A29 | Cluster: Rejection The shortened lead time for EEG-/KWKG market locations in business transaction 1 was not met (deadline exceeded). |
| 600 | Does the marketing type stated in the business transaction change as of the day of the requested allocation start (change of marketing type)? | yes | → Step 620 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 605 | — |
| 605 | Is this a „non-EEG-/-KWKG“ market location? | yes | → Step 610 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 620 | — |
| 610 | Is the transmission day no later than the day before the last WT before the allocation start? | yes | End | EBD E_0621_Check whether a request to terminate the assignment is required |
| — | — | no | A30 | Cluster: Rejection The lead time for a „Non-EEG-/-KWKG“ market location in business transaction 2 was not met (deadline exceeded). |
| 620 | Is the specified date “Start of supply” the 1st of a calendar month 00:00? | no | A31 | Cluster: Rejection The start of supply may only be the 1st of a calendar month 00:00 |
| — | — | yes | → Step 630 | — |
| 630 | Is the lead time met? | yes | End | EBD E_0621_Check whether a request to terminate the assignment is required |
| — | — | no | A32 | Cluster: Rejection The lead time for EEG-/KWKG market locations in business transaction 2 was not met (deadline exceeded). |
| 800 | Is the specified date “Start of supply” the 1st of a calendar month 00:00? | no | → step 805 | — |
| — | — | yes | → step 810 | — |
| 805 | Is this a „non-EEG-/-KWKG“ market location? | yes | → step 806 | — |
| — | — | no | → step 810 | — |
| 806 | Is the transmission day no later than the day before the last WT before the allocation start? | yes | End | EBD E_0621_Check whether a request to terminate the assignment is required |
| — | — | no | A35 | Cluster: Rejection The lead time for a „non-EEG-/-KWKG“ market location was not met. |
| 810 | Is the lead time of one month met? | no | A44 | Cluster: Rejection Deadline exceeded |
| — | — | yes | → step 830 | — |
| 830 | Is the specified percentage still free at the market location? | no | End | EBD E_0621_Check whether a request to terminate the assignment is required Note: the request to terminate the assignment must always be sent to all LFA and to the registering party! |
| — | — | yes | End | EBD E_0621_Check whether a request to terminate the assignment is required |
Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
A07 | Rejection | Lead time was not met |
A09 | Rejection | The registered dormant market location is not a consuming market location |
A47 | Rejection | The stated market location does not meet the requirements, because the metering classification is not iMS. |
A08 | Rejection | The market location named in the registration (in SG5 LOC+Z16) is not a “customer installation”. The market location to be integrated (in SG5 LOC+Z22) can therefore not be assigned to the “customer installation” market location (in SG5 LOC+Z16). |
A37 | Rejection | The market location to be integrated is not located behind the same grid location(s) as the market location of the "customer installation" ("representation of § 20 (1d) EnWG or § 10c EEG"). |
A46 | Rejection | The market location to be integrated does not meet the requirements, because the metering classification is not iMS. |
A02 | Rejection | The market location identified by market location ID does not participate in market communication. |
A04 | Rejection | Incorrect process |
A05 | Rejection | Requirements cannot be met Note: the deviations must be named |
A06 | Rejection | Another registration is being processed. Note: The allocation start of the registration currently being processed and the point in time from which the NB accepts registrations for this market location again are transmitted. |
A21 | Rejection | Incorrect process |
A24 | Rejection | Not all measuring devices required to determine the energy quantity of the market location are equipped with the metering technology for quarter-hourly measurement. |
A25 | Rejection | Requirements cannot be met Note: the deviations must be named |
A45 | Rejection | Another registration is being processed. Note: The allocation start of the registration currently being processed and the point in time from which the NB accepts registrations for this market location again. |
A34 | Rejection | The lead time for a "non-EEG-/ - KWKG" market location was not met. |
A27 | Rejection | Requirements EEG not met. |
A28 | Rejection | The lead times for EEG-/KWKG market locations in business transaction 1 were not met (deadline exceeded). |
A29 | Rejection | The shortened lead times for EEG-/KWKG- market locations in business transaction 1 were not met (deadline exceeded). |
A30 | Rejection | The lead time for a "non-EEG-/-KWKG" market location in business transaction 2 was not met (deadline exceeded). |
A31 | Rejection | The start of supply may only be the 1st of a calendar month at 00:00 |
A32 | Rejection | The lead times for EEG-/KWKG market locations in business transaction 2 were not met (deadline exceeded). |
A35 | Rejection | The lead time for a "non-EEG-/-KWKG" market location was not met. |
A44 | Rejection | Deadline exceeded |
Notes on this page
Role of the numbers: »response« are the check identifiers that list this tree in the ebd_code column of the check identifier table (knowledge-collection · FV 202604); »checked« is the difference set to it from the return path of the process steps.
Consistent with the generated process
All 23 result codes of the decision tree are contained in the generated process E_0622.bpmn.