NB (69)
E_0523 — Check order placement
Check order placement
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Check order placement |
| Market role | NB |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | GPKE |
| Section | 6.28.1: AD: Order placement of a configuration from LF to NB |
| Check identifiers | Response: 19121, 19124 |
| EBD version | 4.3 |
| As at | — |
Decision tree
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Is this a chargeable configuration? | yes | A01 | Cluster: Rejection Chargeable configuration |
| — | — | no | → Step 20 | — |
| 20 | Is this an order placement of a configuration for a change of the balancing procedure (forecast basis)? | yes | → Step 40 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 30 | — |
| 30 | Is this an order placement of a configuration of a metering time period definition | yes | → Step 140 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 190 | Note: This is an order placement for a different configuration |
| 40 | Is this a market location with the metering classification „iMS“, or a market location in which all metering locations are equipped with a meter of the load profile meter type? | no | A02 | Cluster: Rejection The market location does not have the metering classification „iMS“, or it is not a market location at which all metering locations are equipped with a meter of the type load curve meter. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 50 | — |
| 50 | Does the planned date for changing the forecast basis match the process deadline requirements? | no | A03 | Cluster: Rejection Deadline exceeded |
| — | — | yes | → Step 60 | — |
| 60 | Is this a consuming market location? | no | A04 | Cluster: Rejection Generating market locations with iMS or kME/ RLM are always balanced on the forecast basis using values. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 70 | — |
| 70 | Is there an allocation authorization for the ZRT resulting from the requested forecast basis? | no | A05 | Cluster: Rejection No allocation authorization is available. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 80 | — |
| 80 | Is the requested forecast basis “forecast based on profiles” specified? | yes | → step 90 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 110 | Note: A forecast basis based on values is available. |
| 90 | Is the market location in a location bundle that also contains a generating market location? | yes | → Step 100 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 110 | — |
| 100 | Does the energy quantity generated at the market location match the energy quantity measured in the flow direction generation at the metering location of the grid transfer point? | no | A06 | Cluster: Rejection No full feed-in, no forecast basis using profiles possible |
| — | — | yes | → Step 110 | — |
| 110 | Is this a market location with the metering classification „iMS“? | yes | A18 | Cluster: Rejection Changing the forecast basis is not possible for a market location with the metering classification „iMS“. |
| — | — | no | → Step 130 | — |
| 130 | Has the requested forecast basis already been implemented for the requested date? | yes | A08 | Cluster: Rejection Change already implemented as of the desired date. |
| — | — | no | → Step 220 | — |
| 140 | Is the market location a consuming market location? | no | A10 | Cluster: Rejection Order placements are only possible for consuming market locations |
| — | — | yes | → Step 150 | — |
| 150 | Is the order placement a return to a single-tariff logic? | yes | → Step 190 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 160 | — |
| 160 | Is the requested metering time period part, at the time of application, of the overview of the metering time period definition previously transmitted by the NB? | no | A11 | Cluster: Rejection Metering time period definition not known at the time of application |
| — | — | yes | → Step 170 | — |
| 170 | Is the metering time period specified in the order placement marked as an orderable metering time period in the overview of the metering time period definition of the NB? | no | A12 | Cluster: Rejection Metering time period cannot be ordered |
| — | — | yes | → Step 180 | — |
| 180 | Is the rolled-out metering time period for the metering time period definition available at the time of application? | no | A13 | Cluster: Rejection Rolled-out metering time period for the metering time period definition is not available at the time of application |
| — | — | yes | → Step 190 | — |
| 190 | Is the ordered state already present? | yes | A14 | Cluster: Rejection Ordered state already exists |
| — | — | no | → Step 200 | — |
| 200 | Is the requested configuration fundamentally possible? | yes | → Step 210 | — |
| — | — | no | A15 | Cluster: Rejection Configuration not technically possible Note: e.g. metering time period ordered and single-rate meter installed |
| 210 | Were the lead times for the planned change of the device configuration met? | yes | → Step 220 | — |
| — | — | no | A16 | Cluster: Rejection Deadline exceeded |
| 220 | Has a previously unspecified error occurred? | yes | A99 | Cluster: Rejection Other Note: The identified problem must be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.04.2027 00:00 |
| — | — | no | A17 | Cluster: Consent Order placement is forwarded to the MSB of the market location |
Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
A01 | Rejection | Chargeable configuration |
A02 | Rejection | The market location is not in the metering technology classification „iMS“, or it is not a market location whose metering locations are all equipped with a meter of the load profile meter type. |
A03 | Rejection | Deadline exceeded |
A04 | Rejection | Generating market locations with iMS or kME/ RLM are always balanced on the forecast basis based on values. |
A05 | Rejection | No allocation authorization exists. |
A06 | Rejection | Not full feed-in, no forecast basis based on profiles possible |
A18 | Rejection | Changing the forecast basis is not possible for a market location with the metering classification "iMS". |
A08 | Rejection | Change already implemented for the requested date. |
A10 | Rejection | Order placements are only possible for consuming market locations |
A11 | Rejection | Metering time period definition not known at the point in time of application |
A12 | Rejection | Metering time period cannot be ordered |
A13 | Rejection | Rolled-out metering time period for the metering time period definition is not available at the point in time of application |
A14 | Rejection | Ordered state already present |
A15 | Rejection | Configuration technically not possible Note: e.g. metering time period ordered and single-tariff meter installed |
A16 | Rejection | Deadline exceeded |
A99 | Rejection | Other Note: The identified problem is to be described/named in the response. End of usability: 01.04.2027 00:00 |
A17 | Consent | The order placement is forwarded to the MSB of the market location |
Notes on this page
Role of the numbers: »response« are the check identifiers that list this tree in the ebd_code column of the check identifier table (knowledge-collection · FV 202610); »checked« is the difference set to it from the return path of the process steps.
Consistent with the generated process
All 17 result codes of the decision tree are contained in the generated process E_0523.bpmn.