NB (69)
E_0594 — Check request from LF
Check request from LF
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Designation | Check request from LF |
| Market role | NB |
| Regulatory determination / chapter | GPKE |
| Section | 6.1.1: AD: Determination of the MaLo-ID of the market location |
| EBD version | 4.3 |
| As at | — |
Decision tree
| Step | Check | Result | Code | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Is the identification criterion “Market location ID” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 30 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 20 | — |
| 20 | Is the identification criterion “Tranche ID” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 30 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 100 | — |
| 30 | Is the “market location ID” or “tranche ID” known to the NB? | yes | → Step 705 | — |
| — | — | no | A14 | Cluster: Rejection The „market location ID“ or „tranche ID“ is not known to the NB. |
| from 100 | The following checks are based on the identification criteria from the request and the entire data stock in the system. | — | — | — |
| 100 | Is the identification criterion “Address” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 105 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 110 | — |
| 105 | [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number) Note: Omitting the house number takes account of the fact that some NB have stored the address of the device rather than the delivery address. If the meter is located in the semi-detached house next door, the customer may not know this. Omitting the town minimizes the problem of typing errors, districts and place-name suffixes. | no | → Step 110 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on one criterion |
| 110 | Are the following identification criteria present in the request: first name and/or surname or company name? | yes | → Step 115 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 120 | — |
| 115 | [Name check] (surname or company name) | no | → Step 120 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on one criterion |
| 120 | Is the identification criterion “Device number” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 125 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 130 | — |
| 125 | [Device number check] | no | → Step 130 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on one criterion |
| 130 | Is the identification criterion “MeLo-ID” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 135 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 140 | — |
| 135 | [MeLo ID check] | no | → Step 140 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on one criterion |
| 140 | Is the identification criterion “Customer number” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 150 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 160 | — |
| 150 | [Customer number check] | no | → Step 160 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on one criterion |
| 160 | Are there 1..n hits in the hit list based on one criterion with one identification criterion? | no | A01 | Cluster: Rejection No market location could be determined from an identification criterion. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 205 | A hit list based on one criterion with 1..n hits from the preceding checks exists |
| from 205 | The following checks are based on the identification criteria from the request and the hit list based on one criterion from the preceding checks. The hit list contains market locations for which at least one of the identification criteria matches an identification criterion of the request. | — | — | — |
| 205 | Are the identification criteria “Address” and “First name and/or surname or company name” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 210 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 215 | — |
| 210 | Combination of [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number) and [Name check] (surname or company name) | no | → Step 215 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on two criteria |
| 215 | Are the identification criteria “First name and/or surname or company name” and “Device number” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 220 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 225 | — |
| 220 | Combination of [name check] (last name or company name) and [device number check] | no | → Step 225 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on two criteria |
| 225 | Are the identification criteria “Device number” and “Address” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 230 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 235 | — |
| 230 | Combination of [Device number check] and [Address check] (PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number) | no | → Step 235 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on two criteria |
| 235 | Are the identification criteria “MeLo ID” and “Address” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 240 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 245 | — |
| 240 | Combination of [MeLo ID check] and [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number) | no | → Step 245 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on two criteria |
| 245 | Are the identification criteria “MeLo ID” and “First name and/or surname or company name” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 250 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 261 | — |
| 250 | Combination of [MeLo ID check] and [name check] (last name or company name) | no | → Step 261 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on two criteria |
| 261 | Are the identification criteria “Customer number” and “Address” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 262 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 263 | — |
| 262 | Combination of [Customer number check] and [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number) | no | → Step 263 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on two criteria |
| 263 | Are the identification criteria “Customer number” and “First name and/or surname or company name” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 264 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 265 | — |
| 264 | Combination of [Customer number check] and [Name check] (surname or company name) | no | → Step 265 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on two criteria |
| 265 | Are there 1..n hits in the hit list based on the combinations of two criteria with a combination of the identification criteria? | no | → Step 270 | Offers the option of identifying a MaLo ID solely on the basis of an address |
| — | — | yes | → Step 305 | A hit list based on two criteria with 1..n hits from the preceding checks exists |
| 270 | Is the identification criterion “Address” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 275 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 280 | — |
| 275 | Complete [address check] | no | → Step 280 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on the address check alone |
| 280 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on the address check alone with the identification criterion „address“? | no | A02 | Cluster: Rejection No market location could be determined from the combination of two identification criteria Note: The rejection takes place here if there is no market location for which at least one combination of two identification criteria applies unique identification is also not possible with the address alone |
| — | — | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| from 305 | The following checks are based on the identification criteria from the request and the hit list based on two criteria from the preceding checks. The hit list contains market locations for which at least one combination of two identification criteria matches the request. | — | — | — |
| 305 | Are the identification criteria “Address”, “First name and/or surname or company name” and “Device number” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 310 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 315 | — |
| 310 | Combination of [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number), [Name check] (surname or company name) and [Device number check] | no | → Step 315 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on three criteria |
| 315 | Are the identification criteria “Address”, “First name and/or surname or company name” and “MeLo ID” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 320 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 343 | — |
| 320 | Combination of [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number), [Name check] (surname or company name) and [MeLo ID check] | no | → Step 343 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on three criteria |
| 343 | Are the identification criteria “Customer number”, “First name and/or surname or company name” and “Address” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 344 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 345 | — |
| 344 | Combination of [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number), [Name check] (surname or company name) and [Customer number check] | no | → Step 345 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on three criteria |
| 345 | Are there hits in the hit list based on three criteria with three identification criteria? | no | → Step 350 | There is no match with three identification criteria |
| — | — | yes | → Step 400 | There are 1..n matches from the combinations of three identification criteria each |
| 350 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on two criteria with two identification criteria? | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| — | — | no | → Step 355 | There are 2..n matches from the combinations of two identification criteria each |
| 355 | Is the identification criterion “Address” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 360 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 370 | — |
| 360 | Complete [address check] | no | → Step 365 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on the complete address check |
| 365 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on the complete address check with the identification criterion „address“? | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| — | — | no | → Step 385 | — |
| 370 | Is the identification criterion “First name and/or last name or company name” contained in the request? | yes | → Step 375 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 385 | — |
| 375 | Complete [name check] | no | → Step 380 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on the complete name check |
| 380 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on the complete name check with the identification criterion „first name and/or last name or company name“ | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| — | — | no | → Step 385 | — |
| 385 | Are 1..n MaLo from the hit list based on two criteria located in the grid area of NB as at the request date? | yes | → Step 390 | 1..n of the determined MaLo are in the grid area of the NB on the request date |
| — | — | no | → Step 395 | None of the determined MaLo lies within the grid area of the NB on the request date |
| 390 | Does only one of the determined market locations participate in market communication on the request date? | no | A03 | Cluster: Rejection Market location not unique or does not participate in market communication |
| — | — | yes | → Step 720 | — |
| 395 | Can only one MaLo be determined in a grid area handed over within the past three years? | yes | A04 | Cluster: Rejection The determined market location lies in a grid area that was handed over within the last three years. Note: Statement of the MP-ID of the NB to which the grid area was handed over. |
| — | — | no | A05 | Cluster: Rejection No market location could be determined from the combination of two identification criteria |
| from 400 | The following checks are based on the identification criteria from the request and the hit list based on three criteria from the preceding checks. The hit list contains market locations for which at least one combination of three identification criteria matches the request. | — | — | — |
| 400 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on three criteria for which a combination of three identification criteria applies? | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| — | — | no | → Step 405 | There are 2..n matches from the combinations of three identification criteria each |
| 405 | Are all five identification criteria contained in the request? | yes | → Step 410 | — |
| — | — | no | → Step 420 | — |
| 410 | Combination of [Address check] (street and PLZ or geographic coordinates or land parcel number), [Name check] (surname or company name), [Device number check] and [MeLo ID check], [Customer number check] | no | → Step 415 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the new hit list based on four criteria |
| 415 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on three criteria with four or more identification criteria? | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| — | — | no | → Step 420 | There are 2..n matches from four identification criteria |
| 420 | Complete [address check] | no | → Step 425 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on the complete address check |
| 425 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on the complete address check with the identification criterion „address“? | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| — | — | no | → Step 430 | — |
| 430 | Complete [name check] | no | → Step 435 | Inclusion of 0..n hits in the hit list based on the complete name check |
| 435 | Is there exactly one hit in the hit list based on the complete name check with the identification criterion „first name and/or last name or company name“ | yes | → Step 705 | Exactly one market location could be determined |
| — | — | no | → Step 440 | — |
| 440 | Are 1..n MaLo from the hit list based on three criteria located in the grid area of NB as at the request date? | yes | → Step 445 | 1..n of the determined MaLo are in the grid area of the NB on the request date |
| — | — | no | → Step 450 | None of the determined MaLo lies within the grid area of the NB on the request date |
| 445 | Is only one of the determined market locations not decommissioned as at the request date? | no | A06 | Cluster: Rejection Market location not unique or does not participate in market communication |
| — | — | yes | → Step 720 | — |
| 450 | Can only one MaLo be determined in a grid area handed over within the past three years? | yes | A07 | Cluster: Rejection The determined market location lies in a grid area that was handed over within the last three years. Note: Statement of the MP-ID of the NB to which the grid area was handed over. |
| — | — | no | A08 | Cluster: Rejection No market location could be determined from the combination of three identification criteria |
| 705 | Is the determined market location in the grid area of NB as at the request date? | no | A09 | Cluster: Rejection The determined market location lies in a grid area that was handed over within the last three years. Note: Statement of the MP-ID of the NB to which the grid area was handed over. |
| — | — | yes | → Step 710 | Market location is in the grid area |
| 710 | Is the identified market location a decommissioned market location? | yes | A10 | Cluster: Rejection Identified market location is decommissioned |
| — | — | no | → Step 720 | — |
| 720 | Did the requested party request a power of attorney from the requesting party for the identification? | no | End | Cluster: consent Transfer of the MaLo ID of the identified market location. The response returns the MaLo ID and the complete data record as it is stored at the NB. Note: In the case of a positive response, no response code is transmitted |
| — | — | yes | → Step 730 | Note: The request for a power of attorney in a justified individual case is to be sent bilaterally to the requester. The email address from the SG4 NAD+Z13 contact person switching processes of the communication data sheet of the requester is to be used for this purpose. The response of the requested party is sent to the email address from the SG4 NAD+Z13 contact person switching processes of the communication data sheet of the NB. |
| 730 | Has the power of attorney been received? | yes | → Step 740 | — |
| — | — | no | End | Note: As long as the power of attorney has not arrived at the NB, the process waits at this check step. This check is to be carried out again at regular intervals until the power of attorney has arrived. |
| 740 | Does the NB consider the power of attorney to be effective? | yes | End | Cluster: consent Transfer of the MaLo ID of the identified market location. The response returns the MaLo ID and the complete data record as it is stored at the NB. Note: In the case of a positive response, no response code is transmitted |
| — | — | no | A13 | Cluster: Rejection The power of attorney submitted by the requesting party is regarded as not effective. Note: The NB substantiates the rejection due to the lack of effectiveness of the power of attorney |
Result codes
| Result code | Cluster | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
A14 | Rejection | The "market location ID" or "tranche ID" is not known to the NB. |
A01 | Rejection | No market location could be determined with an identification criterion. |
A02 | Rejection | No market location could be determined from the combination of two identification criteria Note: The rejection occurs here if there is no market location for which at least one combination of two identification criteria applies the address alone also does not allow unique identification |
A03 | Rejection | Market location not unique or does not participate in market communication |
A04 | Rejection | The determined market location lies in a grid area transferred within the last three years. Note: Specification of the MP-ID of the NB to which the grid area was transferred. |
A05 | Rejection | No market location could be determined from the combination of two identification criteria |
A06 | Rejection | Market location not unique or does not participate in market communication |
A07 | Rejection | The determined market location lies in a grid area transferred within the last three years. Note: Specification of the MP-ID of the NB to which the grid area was transferred. |
A08 | Rejection | No market location could be determined from the combination of three identification criteria |
A09 | Rejection | The determined market location lies in a grid area transferred within the last three years. Note: Specification of the MP-ID of the NB to which the grid area was transferred. |
A10 | Rejection | Identified market location is decommissioned |
A13 | Rejection | The power of attorney submitted by the requesting party is regarded as not effective. Note: The NB gives reasons for the rejection due to the lack of effectiveness of the power of attorney |
Notes on this page
Consistent with the generated process
All 12 result codes of the decision tree are contained in the generated process E_0594.bpmn.